2MJ7

Solution NMR structure of beta-adaptin appendage domain of human adaptor protein complex 4 subunit beta, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) Target HR8998C


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
22D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
33D HNCO0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
43D CBCA(CO)NH0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
53D HNCACB0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
63D HN(CA)CO0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
73D simutaneous 13C-aromatic,13C-aliphatic,15N edited 1H-1H NOESY0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
82D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
93D HBHA(CO)NH0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
103D HA(CO)NH0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
113D HNCA0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
123D (H)CCH-TOCSY aliphatic0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
133D (H)CCH-COSY aliphatic0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
143D (H)CCH-COSY aromatic0.2 mM HR8998C NC90% H2O/10% D2O
152D 1H-15N long-range HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, Pf1 phage80% H2O/20% D2O
162D 1H-15N HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, Pf1 phage80% H2O/20% D2O6.5ambient295
172D 1H-15N HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, Pf1 phage80% H2O/20% D2O
182D 1H-15N HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, Pf1 phage80% H2O/20% D2O
192D 1H-15N HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, Pf1 phage80% H2O/20% D2O
202D 1H-15N HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, Pf1 phage80% H2O/20% D2O
212D 1H-15N HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, Pf1 phage80% H2O/20% D2O
222D 1H-15N J-modulated HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, 4% PEG/hexanol80% H2O/20% D2O6.5ambient295
232D 1H-15N J-modulated HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, 4% PEG/hexanol80% H2O/20% D2O6.5ambient295
242D 1H-15N J-modulated HSQC0.2 mM HR8998C NC5, 4% PEG/hexanol80% H2O/20% D2O6.5ambient295
252D 1H-13C CT-HSQC methyl0.4 mM HR8998C NC590% H2O/10% D2O
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA750
2AgilentDD2600
3VarianINOVA600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingStructure determination was performed by running CYANA and ASDP in parallel using NOE-based constraints. Consensus peak assignments were selected and used in iterative refinement with CYANA, with PHI, PSI and CHI1 dihedral angle constraints from TALOSN, as well as RDC constraints from two alignment media added at later stages. The 20 conformers out of 100 with the lowest target function were further refined by simulated annealing in explicit water bath using the program CNS with PARAM19 force field.CNS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriatarget function
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementCNS1.3Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2structure solutionCNS1.3Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
3geometry optimizationCNS1.3Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4refinementCYANA3.0Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5geometry optimizationCYANA3.0Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
6structure solutionCYANA3.0Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
7data analysisAS-DP1.0Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
8refinementAS-DP1.0Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
9structure solutionAS-DP1.0Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
10data analysisAutoAssign2.3.0Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
11chemical shift assignmentAutoAssign2.3.0Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
12processingNMRPipeDelaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
13data analysisXEASYBartels et al.
14processingPROSA6.4Guntert
15collectionVnmrJVarian
16data analysisSparkyGoddard
17geometry optimizationTALOSNShen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
18chemical shift assignmentCARA1.8.4Keller and Wuthrich
19data analysisCARA1.8.4Keller and Wuthrich
20peak pickingCARA1.8.4Keller and Wuthrich
21structure validationPSVS1.5Bhattacharya, Montelione