6OFL

Crystal structure of green fluorescent protein (GFP); S65T, Y66(3-ClY); ih circular permutant (50-51)


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.25 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.158 
  • R-Value Work: 0.127 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.128 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Unified Model for Photophysical and Electro-Optical Properties of Green Fluorescent Proteins.

Lin, C.Y.Romei, M.G.Oltrogge, L.M.Mathews, I.I.Boxer, S.G.

(2019) J Am Chem Soc 141: 15250-15265

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b07152
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    6OFK, 6OFL, 6OFM, 6OFN, 6OFO

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Green fluorescent proteins (GFPs) have become indispensable imaging and optogenetic tools. Their absorption and emission properties can be optimized for specific applications. Currently, no unified framework exists to comprehensively describe these photophysical properties, namely the absorption maxima, emission maxima, Stokes shifts, vibronic progressions, extinction coefficients, Stark tuning rates, and spontaneous emission rates, especially one that includes the effects of the protein environment. In this work, we study the correlations among these properties from systematically tuned GFP environmental mutants and chromophore variants. Correlation plots reveal monotonic trends, suggesting that all these properties are governed by one underlying factor dependent on the chromophore's environment. By treating the anionic GFP chromophore as a mixed-valence compound existing as a superposition of two resonance forms, we argue that this underlying factor is defined as the difference in energy between the two forms, or the driving force, which is tuned by the environment. We then introduce a Marcus-Hush model with the bond length alternation vibrational mode, treating the GFP absorption band as an intervalence charge transfer band. This model explains all of the observed strong correlations among photophysical properties; related subtopics are extensively discussed in the Supporting Information. Finally, we demonstrate the model's predictive power by utilizing the additivity of the driving force. The model described here elucidates the role of the protein environment in modulating the photophysical properties of the chromophore, providing insights and limitations for designing new GFPs with desired phenotypes. We argue that this model should also be generally applicable to both biological and nonbiological polymethine dyes.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Chemistry , Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 , United States.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Green fluorescent protein (GFP); S65T, Y66(3-ClY); ih circular permutant (50-51)
A, B
251Aequorea victoriaMutation(s): 0 
UniProt
Find proteins for P42212 (Aequorea victoria)
Explore P42212 
Go to UniProtKB:  P42212
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP42212
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Modified Residues  1 Unique
IDChains TypeFormula2D DiagramParent
4NT
Query on 4NT
A, B
L-PEPTIDE LINKINGC15 H16 Cl N3 O5THR, TYR, GLY
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.25 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.158 
  • R-Value Work: 0.127 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.128 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 52.22α = 90
b = 68.73β = 100.57
c = 60.88γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
PHENIXrefinement
XDSdata reduction
XDSdata scaling
PHENIXphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)United States118044

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2019-07-10
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2019-10-02
    Changes: Data collection, Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2020-01-01
    Changes: Author supporting evidence
  • Version 1.3: 2023-10-11
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Refinement description
  • Version 1.4: 2023-11-15
    Changes: Advisory, Data collection, Derived calculations