6EE5

Reactive centre loop dynamics and serpin specificity


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.48 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.259 
  • R-Value Work: 0.199 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.202 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Reactive centre loop dynamics and serpin specificity.

Marijanovic, E.M.Fodor, J.Riley, B.T.Porebski, B.T.Costa, M.G.S.Kass, I.Hoke, D.E.McGowan, S.Buckle, A.M.

(2019) Sci Rep 9: 3870-3870

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40432-w
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    6EE5

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Serine proteinase inhibitors (serpins), typically fold to a metastable native state and undergo a major conformational change in order to inhibit target proteases. However, conformational lability of the native serpin fold renders them susceptible to misfolding and aggregation, and underlies misfolding diseases such as α 1 -antitrypsin deficiency. Serpin specificity towards its protease target is dictated by its flexible and solvent exposed reactive centre loop (RCL), which forms the initial interaction with the target protease during inhibition. Previous studies have attempted to alter the specificity by mutating the RCL to that of a target serpin, but the rules governing specificity are not understood well enough yet to enable specificity to be engineered at will. In this paper, we use conserpin, a synthetic, thermostable serpin, as a model protein with which to investigate the determinants of serpin specificity by engineering its RCL. Replacing the RCL sequence with that from α1-antitrypsin fails to restore specificity against trypsin or human neutrophil elastase. Structural determination of the RCL-engineered conserpin and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that, although the RCL sequence may partially dictate specificity, local electrostatics and RCL dynamics may dictate the rate of insertion during protease inhibition, and thus whether it behaves as an inhibitor or a substrate. Engineering serpin specificity is therefore substantially more complex than solely manipulating the RCL sequence, and will require a more thorough understanding of how conformational dynamics achieves the delicate balance between stability, folding and function required by the exquisite serpin mechanism of action.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Victoria, 3800, Australia.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Conserpin-AATRCL379synthetic constructMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.48 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.259 
  • R-Value Work: 0.199 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.202 
  • Space Group: C 2 2 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 68.06α = 90
b = 75.28β = 90
c = 150.45γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
iMOSFLMdata reduction
SCALAdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2018-08-29
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2019-03-20
    Changes: Data collection, Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2019-11-06
    Changes: Author supporting evidence, Data collection
  • Version 1.3: 2023-10-11
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Refinement description