1LRP

COMPARISON OF THE STRUCTURES OF CRO AND LAMBDA REPRESSOR PROTEINS FROM BACTERIOPHAGE LAMBDA


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 3.20 Å

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Comparison of the structures of cro and lambda repressor proteins from bacteriophage lambda.

Ohlendorf, D.H.Anderson, W.F.Lewis, M.Pabo, C.O.Matthews, B.W.

(1983) J Mol Biol 169: 757-769

  • DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80169-7
  • Structures With Same Primary Citation

  • PubMed Abstract: 
  • The three-dimensional structures of cro repressor protein and of the amino-terminal domain of lambda repressor protein, both from bacteriophage lambda, are compared. The second and third alpha-helices, alpha 2 and alpha 3, are shown to have essential ...

    The three-dimensional structures of cro repressor protein and of the amino-terminal domain of lambda repressor protein, both from bacteriophage lambda, are compared. The second and third alpha-helices, alpha 2 and alpha 3, are shown to have essentially identical conformations in the two proteins, confirming the significance of the amino acid sequence homology previously noted between these and other DNA binding proteins in the region corresponding to these helices. The correspondence between the two-helical units in cro and lambda repressor protein is better than the striking agreement noted previously between two-helical units in cro and catabolite gene-activator protein. Parts of the first alpha-helices of repressor and cro show a structural correspondence that suggests a revised sequence homology between the two proteins in their extreme amino-terminal regions. In particular, there is a short loop between the alpha 1 and alpha 2 helices of lambda repressor that is missing from cro. This structural difference may account for the observed differences found with different cros and repressors in the pattern of phosphates whose ethylation prevents the binding of these proteins to their specific recognition sites. Although the two proteins have strikingly similar alpha 2-alpha 3 helical units that are presumed to bind to DNA in an essentially similar manner, stereochemical restrictions prevent the alpha 2-alpha 3 units of the respective proteins aligning on the DNA in exactly the same way.


    Related Citations: 
    • Structure of the Operator-Binding Domain of Bacteriophage Lambda Repressor. Implications for DNA Recognition and Gene Regulation
      Lewis, M., Jeffrey, A., Wang, J., Ladner, R., Ptashne, M., Pabo, C.O.
      (1983) Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 47: 435
    • Homology Among DNA-Binding Proteins Suggests Use of a Conserved Super-Secondary Structure
      Sauer, R.T., Yocum, R.R., Doolittle, R.F., Lewis, M., Pabo, C.O.
      (1982) Nature 298: 447
    • The Operator-Binding Domain of Lambda Repressor. Structure and DNA Recognition
      Pabo, C.O., Lewis, M.
      (1982) Nature 298: 443
    • The N-Terminal Arms of Lambda Repressor Wrap Around the Operator DNA
      Pabo, C.O., Krovatin, W., Jeffrey, A., Sauer, R.T.
      (1982) Nature 298: 441

    Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 2-11-16 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan. Electronic address: nureki@bs.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.



Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by: Sequence  |  Structure

Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetails
LAMBDA REPRESSORA, B, C92Escherichia virus LambdaMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: cIlambdap88
Find proteins for P03034 (Escherichia phage lambda)
Explore P03034 
Go to UniProtKB:  P03034
Protein Feature View
 ( Mouse scroll to zoom / Hold left click to move )
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 3.20 Å
  • Space Group: P 32 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 65α = 90
b = 65β = 90
c = 149.6γ = 120

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

  • Deposited Date: 1987-12-04 
  • Released Date: 1989-01-09 
  • Deposition Author(s): Pabo, C., Lewis, M.

Revision History 

  • Version 1.0: 1989-01-09
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-03-24
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Advisory, Version format compliance