1S50

X-ray structure of the GluR6 ligand binding core (S1S2A) in complex with glutamate at 1.65 A resolution


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.65 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.230 
  • R-Value Work: 0.200 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.201 

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Crystal structures of the GluR5 and GluR6 ligand binding cores: Molecular mechanisms underlying kainate receptor selectivity

Mayer, M.L.

(2005) Neuron 45: 539-552

  • DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.031
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1S50, 1S7Y, 1S9T, 1SD3, 1TT1, 1TXF

  • PubMed Abstract: 
  • Little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying differences in the ligand binding properties of AMPA, kainate, and NMDA subtype glutamate receptors. Crystal structures of the GluR5 and GluR6 kainate receptor ligand binding cores in complexe ...

    Little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying differences in the ligand binding properties of AMPA, kainate, and NMDA subtype glutamate receptors. Crystal structures of the GluR5 and GluR6 kainate receptor ligand binding cores in complexes with glutamate, 2S,4R-4-methylglutamate, kainate, and quisqualate have now been solved. The structures reveal that the ligand binding cavities are 40% (GluR5) and 16% (GluR6) larger than for GluR2. The binding of AMPA- and GluR5-selective agonists to GluR6 is prevented by steric occlusion, which also interferes with the high-affinity binding of 2S,4R-4-methylglutamate to AMPA receptors. Strikingly, the extent of domain closure produced by the GluR6 partial agonist kainate is only 3 degrees less than for glutamate and 11 degrees greater than for the GluR2 kainate complex. This, together with extensive interdomain contacts between domains 1 and 2 of GluR5 and GluR6, absent from AMPA receptors, likely contributes to the high stability of GluR5 and GluR6 kainate complexes.


    Organizational Affiliation

    Porter Neuroscience Research Center, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. mlm@helix.nih.gov



Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Glutamate Receptor 6A259Rattus norvegicusMutation(s): 2 
Gene Names: GluR6 residues 398-513 and 636-775
Find proteins for P42260 (Rattus norvegicus)
Explore P42260 
Go to UniProtKB:  P42260
Protein Feature View
Expand
 ( Mouse scroll to zoom / Hold left click to move )
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChainsName / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
GLU
Query on GLU

Download CCD File 
A
GLUTAMIC ACID
C5 H9 N O4
WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-VKHMYHEASA-N
 Ligand Interaction
External Ligand Annotations 
IDBinding Affinity (Sequence Identity %)
GGLEC50:  25000   nM  BindingDB
GLUKi:  1400   nM  Binding MOAD
GLUKi :  63   nM  PDBBind
GGLEC50:  66000   nM  BindingDB
GGLKi:  1106   nM  BindingDB
GGLKi:  330   nM  BindingDB
GGLKi:  331   nM  BindingDB
GGLKi:  332   nM  BindingDB
GGLEC50:  73000   nM  BindingDB
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.65 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.230 
  • R-Value Work: 0.200 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.201 
  • Space Group: P 61
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 52.272α = 90
b = 52.272β = 90
c = 169.411γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
HKL-2000data collection
SCALEPACKdata scaling
AMoREphasing
CNSrefinement
HKL-2000data reduction

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

  • Deposited Date: 2004-01-19 
  • Released Date: 2005-02-08 
  • Deposition Author(s): Mayer, M.L.

Revision History 

  • Version 1.0: 2005-02-08
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-29
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2017-07-26
    Changes: Advisory, Refinement description, Source and taxonomy