The X-Ray Structure of (Mebm2T)1-Cyclosporin Complexed with Cyclophilin a Provides an Explanation for its Anomalously High Immunosuppressive Activity.Mikol, V., Kallen, J., Walkinshaw, M.D.
(1994) Protein Eng 7: 597
- PubMed: 8073029
- DOI: 10.1093/protein/7.5.597
- Primary Citation of Related Structures:
- PubMed Abstract:
- Crystallization of the Complex between Cyclophilin a and Cyclosporin Derivatives: The Use of Cross- Seeding.
Mikol, V., Duc, D.
(1994) Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 50: 543
- Improved Binding Affinity for Cyclophilin a by a Cyclosporin Derivative Singly Modified at its Effector Domain.
Papageorgiou, C., Florineth, A., Mikol, V.
(1994) J Med Chem 37: 3674
- X-Ray Structure of a Monomeric Cyclophilin A- Cyclosporin a Crystal Complex at 2.1 A Resolution.
Mikol, V., Kallen, J., Pflugl, G., Walkinshaw, M.D.
(1993) J Mol Biol 234: 1119
- X-Ray Structure of a Decameric Cyclophilin- Cyclosporin Crystal Complex.
Pflugl, G., Kallen, J., Schirmer, T., Jansonius, J.N., Zurini, M.G., Walkinshaw, M.D.
(1993) Nature 361: 91
For most of the cyclosporin A (CsA) analogs, there is generally a good correlation between cyclophilin binding and immunosuppression. However, this relationship does not seem to hold for 4-[(E)-2-butenyl]-4,4,N-trimethyl-L-threonine1 (MeBm2t)1-CsA. I ...
For most of the cyclosporin A (CsA) analogs, there is generally a good correlation between cyclophilin binding and immunosuppression. However, this relationship does not seem to hold for 4-[(E)-2-butenyl]-4,4,N-trimethyl-L-threonine1 (MeBm2t)1-CsA. Its affinity for cyclophilin was reported to be approximately 1% that of CsA and its immunosuppressive activity in vitro was shown to be approximately 30% that of CsA. We report here the crystal structure of a complex between recombinant human cyclophilin A (CypA) and (MeBm2t)1-CsA which has been determined by X-ray crystallography at 2.2 A resolution and refined to an R-factor of 16.3%. (MeBm2t)1-CsA shows a similar bound conformation and network of interactions to CypA as CsA. The measured lower affinity for CypA cannot therefore be explained by a different mode of binding. We propose that the poor affinity to CypA could be accounted for by the existence of an equilibrium in aqueous solution between a 'cyclophilin bound conformation' and a 'non-binding conformation' of (MeBm2t)1-CsA. The relatively high immunosuppressive activity is suggested to result from slight conformational differences observed in the effector domain.
Sandoz AG, Basle, Switzerland.