SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Bruker AVANCE 750
23D HNCO50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Varian INOVA 600
33D HNCACB50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Varian INOVA 600
43D C(CO)NH50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Varian INOVA 600
52D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Bruker AVANCE 750
63D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF19-2100% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Varian INOVA 750
73D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Varian INOVA 750
93D 1H-15N NOESY50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Bruker AVANCE 750
8Deuterium exchange50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Bruker AVANCE 750
103D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Bruker AVANCE 750
113D H(CCO)NH50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DEF1993% H2O/7% D2O70 mM5.41 atm293Varian INOVA 600
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA600
2BrukerAVANCE750
3VarianINOVA750
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
torsion angle dynamicsSTRUCTURE DETERMINATION WAS PERFORMED ITERATIVELY USING CYANA (AUTOMATED NOESY ASSIGNMENTS). A TOTAL OF 20 STRUCTURES OUT OF 100 WITH LOWEST TARGET FUNCTION FROM THE FINAL CYANA CALCULATION WERE TAKEN AND REFINED BY RESTRAINED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS/ENERGY MINIMIZATION IN EXPLICIT WATER (CNS) AFTER ADDING 0% TO THE UPPER BOUNDARY LIMIT OF THE DISTANCE RESTRAINTS AND THE VDW LIMIT TO THE LOWER RESTRAINT. PARAM19 WAS USED FOR THE WATER REFINEMENT CALCULATIONS. Disulfide bond restraints were identified by mass spectrometer and are included in the "NOE" file.CNS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriatarget function
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number19
Representative Model1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1data analysisSparky3.13Goddard
2structure calculationCYANA2.1Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
3processingFelix2007Accelrys Software Inc.
4refinementCNS1.1Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
5data analysisPSVS1.5Bhattacharya and Montelione