SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-1H NOESY1.2-2 mM DNA (28-MER)-190% H2O/10% D2O907298
22D 1H-1H NOESY1.2-2 mM DNA (28-MER)-3100% D2O907298
32D 1H-13C HSQC1.2-2 mM DNA (28-MER)-3100% D2O907298
42D 1H-1H TOCSY1.2-2 mM DNA (28-MER)-3100% D2O907298
51D 15N-Filtered0.2-1 mM [U-2% 15N] DNA (28-MER)-290% H2O/10% D2O907298
61D D-labeled0.2-1 mM [U-100% 2H] DNA (28-MER)-4100% D2O907298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE600
2BrukerAVANCE700
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
DGSA-distance geometry simulated annealingAmber
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number10
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementAmberCase, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
2structure solutionAmberCase, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
3geometry optimizationAmberCase, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
4geometry optimizationX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
5structure solutionX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
6refinementX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
7chemical shift assignmentSparkyGoddard
8data analysisSparkyGoddard
9peak pickingSparkyGoddard
10collectionTopSpinBruker Biospin