SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-1H NOESY2 mM control DNA duplex95% H2O/5% D2O707.0-7.2ambient298
22D 1H-1H TOCSY2 mM control DNA duplex95% H2O/5% D2O707.0-7.2ambient298
32D DQF-COSY2 mM control DNA duplex95% H2O/5% D2O707.0-7.2ambient298
42D DQF-COSY2 mM control DNA duplex95% H2O/5% D2O707.0-7.2ambient298
52D 1H-13C HSQC2 mM control DNA duplex95% H2O/5% D2O707.0-7.2ambient298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA600
2VarianINOVA500
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingThe upper bounds obtained from MARDIGRAS were multiplied by a factor 1.25 before being exported to Amber 10 for a 25 ps simulated annealing protocol. The simulated annealing protocol using the pairwise generalized Born model was as follows: the temperature of the system was kept constant at 600 K during the first 5 ps, cooled down slowly to 100 K between 5-18 ps, and cooled down to 0 K for the last 7 ps. The protocol was repeated 50 times to obtain an NMR ensemble with the 10 lowest RMSD structures. The structure with the lowest RMSD of the ensemble was put back into MARDIGRAS for a second and third cycle of NOE calibration and structure calculations.VnmrJ
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criterialowest RMSD to average structure
Conformers Calculated Total Number50
Conformers Submitted Total Number10
Representative Model1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1collectionVnmrJ2.1BVarian
2processingNMRPipe4.9Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
3chemical shift assignmentNMRView8.0.b30Johnson, One Moon Scientific
4noe calibrationMARDIGRAST.L. James
5structure solutionAmber10Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, and Kollm
6refinementAmber10Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, and Kollm
7structure validationCORMAT.L. James