SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
13D_15N-separated_NOESY3.3 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SDF1a H25R, 25 mM [U-99% 2H] MES, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O90% H2O/10% D2O206.8AMBIENT298
23D_13C-separated_NOESY3.3 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SDF1a H25R, 25 mM [U-99% 2H] MES, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O90% H2O/10% D2O206.8AMBIENT298
33D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC)3.3 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SDF1a H25R, 25 mM [U-99% 2H] MES, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O90% H2O/10% D2O206.8AMBIENT298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerDRX600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENTSTRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1430 NOE CONSTRAINTS (339 INTRA, 388 SEQUENTIAL, 263 MEDIUM, AND 440 LONG RANGE) AND 65 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS.TopSpin
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriatarget function
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1collectionTopSpin2.1Bruker
2processingNMRPipe2007Delagio,F. et al.
3data analysisXEASY1.3Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
4data analysisSPSCAN1.1.0R.W. Glaser
5data analysisGARANT2.1C. Bartels
6structural calculationCYANA2.1Guntert, P.
7refinementXplor-NIH2.9.3SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.