SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
13D_15N-separated_NOESY1 mM CXCL14 U-15N, 13C; 100mM phosphate buffer, 150mM NaCl,95% H2O, 5% D2O95% H2O/5% D2O300 mM6.5AMBIENT298
23D_13C-separated_NOESY1 mM CXCL14 U-15N, 13C; 100mM phosphate buffer, 150mM NaCl,95% H2O, 5% D2O95% H2O/5% D2O300 mM6.5AMBIENT298
33D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC)1 mM CXCL14 U-15N, 13C; 100mM phosphate buffer, 150mM NaCl,95% H2O, 5% D2O95% H2O/5% D2O300 mM6.5AMBIENT298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerDRX600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENSTRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 894 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 366 INTRA, 186 SEQUENTIAL, 133 MEDIUM and 209 LONG RANGE CONSTRAINTS) AND 97 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS.XwinNMR
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriatarget function
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsALL TRIPLE-RESONANCE AND NOESY SPECTRA WERE ACQUIRED USING A CRYOGENIC PROBE
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1collectionXwinNMR3.5
2processingNMRPipe2004Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G.W., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., Bax, A.
3data analysisSPSCAN1.1.0Glaser, R.W.
4data analysisXEASY1.3Bartels, C, Xia, T.-H., Billeter, M., Guntert, P., Wuthrich, K.
5data analysisGARANT2.1Bartels, C., Billeter, M., Guntert, P., Wuthrich, K.
6structure solutionCYANA2.1Herrmann, T., Guntert, P., Wuthrich, K.
7refinementXPLOR-NIH2.9.3Schwieters, C.D., Kuszewski, J.J, Tjandra, N., Clore, G.M.