| simulated annealing | THE STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SIMULATED
ANNEALING PROTOCOL OF NILGES ET AL. (1988) FEBS LETT. 229,
129-136 USING THE PROGRAM X-PLOR 3.1 (BRUNGER) MODIFIED TO
INCORPORATE COUPLING CONSTANT (GARRETT ET AL. (1984) J.
MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 104, 99-103) AND CARBON CHEMICAL
SHIFT (KUSZEWSKI ET AL. (1995) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B
106, 92-96) RESTRAINTS, AND T1/T2 RESTRAINTS
(TJANDRA ET AL. NATURE STRUCT. BIOL. 4, 443-449, 1997).
IN THIS ENTRY THE LAST COLUMN REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE RMS
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL SIMULATED ANNEALING
STRUCTURES AND THE MEAN COORDINATE POSITIONS. THE LAST
COLUMN IN THE INDIVIDUAL SA STRUCTURES HAS NO MEANING.
BEST FITTING TO GENERATE THE AVERAGE STRUCTURE IS WITH
RESPECT TO RESIDUES 1 - 246 (RESIDUES 250 - 259 ARE
DISORDERED IN SOLUTION).
THE DIFFUSION AXIS IS REPRESENTED BY A LINE CONNECTING THE
FOLLOWING POINTS:
MODEL 1
P1 98.704 -8.634 6.291
P2 100.199 -8.778 6.547
MODEL 2
P1 98.931 -5.748 10.946
P2 100.415 -5.983 11.191
MODEL 3
P1 99.599 -3.491 4.832
P2 101.089 -3.639 5.107
MODEL 4
P1 98.518 -10.247 4.022
P2 100.021 -10.426 4.194
MODEL 5
P1 98.892 -9.643 8.429
P2 100.382 -9.849 8.666
MODEL 6
P1 98.187 -10.433 9.895
P2 99.687 -10.622 10.090
MODEL 7
P1 98.045 -10.499 13.089
P2 99.524 -10.671 13.411
MODEL 8
P1 99.528 -4.087 7.695
P2 101.004 -4.267 8.022
MODEL 9
P1 98.685 -8.524 9.303
P2 100.183 -8.747 9.462
MODEL 10
P1 99.072 -8.432 7.916
P2 100.564 -8.633 8.149
MODEL 11
P1 99.021 -6.823 7.559
P2 100.509 -6.952 7.857
MODEL 12
P1 98.326 -9.444 11.667
P2 99.823 -9.615 11.894
MODEL 13
P1 98.562 -11.334 4.771
P2 100.052 -11.528 5.020
MODEL 14
P1 99.482 -4.480 4.665
P2 100.959 -4.700 4.955 | X-PLOR |
