1P1T
NMR Structure of the N-terminal RRM domain of Cleavage stimulation factor 64 KDa subunit
SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
1 | 2D NOESY | 1mM CstF U-15N, 20mM phosphate buffer | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 20mM | 6.0 | ambient | 300 | |
2 | 3D_15N-separated_NOESY | 1mM CstF U-15N, 20mM phosphate buffer | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 20mM | 6.0 | ambient | 300 | |
3 | 2D NOESY | 1mM CstF , 20mM phosphate buffer | 100% D2O | 20mM | 6.0 | ambient | 300 | |
4 | 15N-HSQC | 1mM CstF U-15N, 20mM phosphate buffer | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 20mM | 6.0 | ambient | 300 | |
5 | 13C-HSQC | 1mM CstF U-15N,13C, 20mM phosphate buffer | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 20mM | 6.0 | ambient | 300 | |
6 | HNCA | 1mM CstF U-15N,13C, 20mM phosphate buffer | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 20mM | 6.0 | ambient | 300 | |
7 | HNCO | 1mM CstF U-15N,13C, 20mM phosphate buffer | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 20mM | 6.0 | ambient | 300 | |
8 | CBCA(CO)NH | 1mM CstF U-15N,13C, 20mM phosphate buffer | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 20mM | 6.0 | ambient | 300 | |
9 | HCCH-COSY | 1mM CstF U-15N,13C, 20mM phosphate buffer | 93% H2O/7% D2O | 20mM | 6.0 | ambient | 300 |
NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
1 | Bruker | DRX | 500 |
2 | Bruker | DMX | 600 |
3 | Bruker | AVANCE | 800 |
NMR Refinement | ||
---|---|---|
Method | Details | Software |
simulated annealing torsion angle dynamics | The structures are based on a total of 1486 NOE-derived distance contraints and 115 dihedral angle restrains for phi and psi backbone angles obtained from the analysis of the 13C chemical shifts. | NMRPipe |
NMR Ensemble Information | |
---|---|
Conformer Selection Criteria | The submitted conformer models are the 20 structures with the lowest energy |
Conformers Calculated Total Number | 40 |
Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
Representative Model | 1 (fewest violations) |
Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
---|---|
Details | The structure was determined using triple-resoncance NMR spectroscopy |
Computation: NMR Software | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
1 | processing | NMRPipe | 2001 | Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Pfeifer, Bax |
2 | structure solution | DYANA | 1.5 | Guntert, Mumenthaler, Herrmann |
3 | data analysis | TALOS | 2001 | Cornilescu, Delaglio, Bax |
4 | refinement | DYANA | 1.5 | Guntert, Mumenthaler, Herrmann |