SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | DQF-COSY | 3.9 | 288 | |||||
| 2 | E-COSY | 3.9 | 288 | |||||
| 3 | TOCSY | 3.9 | 288 | |||||
| 4 | NOESY | 3.9 | 288 | |||||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | DMX-750 | 750 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| simulated annealing | STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING A SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL WITH THE PROGRAM X-PLOR. THESE STRUCTURES WERE THEN ENERGY MINIMIZED USING 1000 CYCLES OF CONJUGATE GRADIENT MINIMIZATION WITH A REFINED FORCEFIELD BASED ON THE PROGRAMM CHARMM | X-PLOR |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | LOWEST ENERGIES AND LEAST NUMBER OF RESTRAINT VIOLATIONS |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 50 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
| Representative Model | 1 (n/a) |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | refinement | X-PLOR | 3.1 | BRUNGER |
| 2 | structure solution | X-PLOR | ||
