SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D NOESY | 4 MM DNA DUPLEX, 0.4 ML POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE DISODIUM HYDROGEM PHOSPHATE BUFFER; 100% D2O | 0.1 | 6.9 | AMBIENT | 308 | ||
| 2 | P-COSY | 4 MM DNA DUPLEX, 0.4 ML POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE DISODIUM HYDROGEM PHOSPHATE BUFFER; 100% D2O | 0.1 | 6.9 | AMBIENT | 308 | ||
| 3 | 2D_31P/1H HETEROTOCSY | 4 MM DNA DUPLEX, 0.4 ML POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE DISODIUM HYDROGEM PHOSPHATE BUFFER; 100% D2O | 0.1 | 6.9 | AMBIENT | 308 | ||
| 4 | 2D NOESY | 4 MM DNA DUPLEX, 0.4 ML POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE DISODIUM HYDROGEM PHOSPHATE BUFFER; 90% H2O, 10%D2O | 0.1 | 6.9 | AMBIENT | 283 | ||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | AMX | 500 |
| 2 | Bruker | AMX | 500 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| MOLECULAR DYNAMICS, MATRIX RELAXATION | MODEL 1: AVERAGE OF THE EIGHT STRUCTURES OBTAINED WITH JUMNA AND AMBER94 AS FORCE FIELD. MODEL 2: AVERAGE OF THE EIGHT STRUCTURES OBTAINED WITH JUMNA AND FLEX AS FORCE FIELD. MODEL 3: AVERAGE OF THE SIX STRUCTURES OBTAINED WITH X- PLOR. | JUMNA |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | back calculated data agree with experimental NOESY spectrum |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 22 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 3 |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | structure calculation | JUMNA | 10.1 | LAVERY |
| 2 | structure calculation | X-PLOR | 3.1 | BRUNGER |
| 3 | data analysis | Felix | 97 | MSI |
| 4 | collection | XwinNMR | 2.0 | BRUKER |
| 5 | refinement | X-PLOR | 3.1 | BRUNGER |
