1CS2

NMR STRUCTURES OF B-DNA D(CTACTGCTTTAG).D(CTAAAGCAGTAG)


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D NOESY4 MM DNA DUPLEX, 0.4 ML POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE DISODIUM HYDROGEM PHOSPHATE BUFFER; 100% D2O0.16.9AMBIENT308
2P-COSY4 MM DNA DUPLEX, 0.4 ML POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE DISODIUM HYDROGEM PHOSPHATE BUFFER; 100% D2O0.16.9AMBIENT308
32D_31P/1H HETEROTOCSY4 MM DNA DUPLEX, 0.4 ML POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE DISODIUM HYDROGEM PHOSPHATE BUFFER; 100% D2O0.16.9AMBIENT308
42D NOESY4 MM DNA DUPLEX, 0.4 ML POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE DISODIUM HYDROGEM PHOSPHATE BUFFER; 90% H2O, 10%D2O0.16.9AMBIENT283
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAMX500
2BrukerAMX500
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
MOLECULAR DYNAMICS, MATRIX RELAXATIONMODEL 1: AVERAGE OF THE EIGHT STRUCTURES OBTAINED WITH JUMNA AND AMBER94 AS FORCE FIELD. MODEL 2: AVERAGE OF THE EIGHT STRUCTURES OBTAINED WITH JUMNA AND FLEX AS FORCE FIELD. MODEL 3: AVERAGE OF THE SIX STRUCTURES OBTAINED WITH X- PLOR.JUMNA
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriaback calculated data agree with experimental NOESY spectrum
Conformers Calculated Total Number22
Conformers Submitted Total Number3
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1structure calculationJUMNA10.1LAVERY
2structure calculationX-PLOR3.1BRUNGER
3data analysisFelix97MSI
4collectionXwinNMR2.0BRUKER
5refinementX-PLOR3.1BRUNGER