8C65 | pdb_00008c65

Crystal structure of cutinase AdCut from Acidovorax delafieldii (PBS depolymerase)


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.49 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.215 (Depositor), 0.220 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.175 (Depositor), 0.190 (DCC) 

Starting Model: in silico
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Understanding the Catalytic Efficiency of Two Polyester Degrading Enzymes: An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation.

Clark, M.Tornesakis, K.Konig, G.Zahn, M.Lichtenstein, B.R.Pickford, A.R.Cox, P.A.

(2024) ACS Omega 9: 44724-44733

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c06528
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    8C65

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The discovery of novel plastic degrading enzymes commonly relies on comparing features of the primary sequence to those of known plastic degrading enzymes. However, this approach cannot always guarantee success. This is exemplified by the different degradation rates of the two polymers poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and polybutylene succinate (PBS) by two hydrolases: Is PETase from Ideonella sakaiensis and Ad Cut from Acidovorax delafieldii . Despite the enzymes showing a very high sequence identity of 82%, Is PETase shows significant hydrolysis activity for both polymers, whereas Ad Cut only shows significant hydrolysis activity for PBS. By solving the structure of Ad Cut using X-ray crystallography, and using this as the basis for computer simulations, comparisons are made between the differences in the calculated binding geometries and the catalytic results obtained from biochemical experiments. The results reveal that the low activity of Ad Cut toward PET can be explained by the low sampling of the productive conformation observed in the simulations. While the active site serine in Is PETase can closely encounter the PET carbonyl carbon, in Ad Cut it cannot: a feature that can be attributed to the shape of the catalytic binding pocket. These results yield an important insight into the design requirements for novel plastic degrading enzymes, as well as showing that computational methods can be used as a valuable tool in understanding the molecular basis for different hydrolysis activities in homologous polyesterase enzymes.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Centre for Enzyme Innovation, University of Portsmouth, St Michael's Building, Portsmouth PO1 2DT, U.K.

Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
PBS(A) depolymerase
A, B
271Acidovorax delafieldiiMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: pbsA
UniProt
Find proteins for Q8RR62 (Acidovorax delafieldii)
Explore Q8RR62 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q8RR62
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ8RR62
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.49 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.215 (Depositor), 0.220 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.175 (Depositor), 0.190 (DCC) 
Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 45.798α = 90
b = 96.43β = 111.033
c = 58.525γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
autoPROCdata reduction
STARANISOdata scaling
MOLREPphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)United KingdomResearch England E3

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2024-01-24
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2024-10-16
    Changes: Structure summary
  • Version 1.2: 2024-11-06
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2024-11-27
    Changes: Database references