Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Resolution: 1.60 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.232 
  • R-Value Work: 0.196 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.198 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report

Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

This is version 3.1 of the entry. See complete history


Structural Basis of Multivalent Binding to Wheat Germ Agglutinin.

Schwefel, D.Maierhofer, C.Beck, J.G.Seeberger, S.Diederichs, K.Moller, H.M.Welte, W.Wittmann, V.

(2010) J Am Chem Soc 132: 8704

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja101646k
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    2UVO, 2X3T, 2X52, 4AML

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The inhibition of carbohydrate-protein interactions by tailored multivalent ligands is a powerful strategy for the treatment of many human diseases. Crucial for the success of this approach is an understanding of the molecular mechanisms as to how a binding enhancement of a multivalent ligand is achieved. We have synthesized a series of multivalent N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) derivatives and studied their interaction with the plant lectin wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) by an enzyme-linked lectin assay (ELLA) and X-ray crystallography. The solution conformation of one ligand was determined by NMR spectroscopy. Employing a GlcNAc carbamate motif with alpha-configuration and by systematic variation of the spacer length, we were able to identify divalent ligands with unprecedented high WGA binding potency. The best divalent ligand has an IC(50) value of 9.8 microM (ELLA) corresponding to a relative potency of 2350 (1170 on a valency-corrected basis, i.e., per mol sugar contained) compared to free GlcNAc. X-ray crystallography of the complex of WGA and the second best, closely related divalent ligand explains this activity. Four divalent molecules simultaneously bind to WGA with each ligand bridging adjacent binding sites. This shows for the first time that all eight sugar binding sites of the WGA dimer are simultaneously functional. We also report a tetravalent neoglycopeptide with an IC(50) value of 0.9 microM being 25,500 times higher than that of GlcNAc (6400 times per contained sugar) and the X-ray structure analysis of its complex with glutaraldehyde-cross-linked WGA. Comparison of the crystal structure and the solution NMR structure of the neoglycopeptide as well as results from the ELLA suggest that the conformation of the glycopeptide in solution is already preorganized in a way supporting multivalent binding to the protein. Our findings show that bridging adjacent protein binding sites by multivalent ligands is a valid strategy to find high-affinity protein ligands and that even subtle changes of the linker structure can have a significant impact on the binding affinity.

  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biology, Universität Konstanz, Germany.

Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
A, B
171Triticum aestivumMutation(s): 0 
Find proteins for P10968 (Triticum aestivum)
Explore P10968 
Go to UniProtKB:  P10968
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP10968
Sequence Annotations
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Resolution: 1.60 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.232 
  • R-Value Work: 0.196 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.198 
  • Space Group: P 32 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 63.25α = 90
b = 63.25β = 90
c = 153.55γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
XDSdata reduction
XSCALEdata scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report

Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2012-04-04
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 2.0: 2020-03-11
    Changes: Derived calculations, Other, Polymer sequence
  • Version 2.1: 2020-06-03
    Changes: Derived calculations
  • Version 3.0: 2020-07-29
    Type: Remediation
    Reason: Carbohydrate remediation
    Changes: Atomic model, Derived calculations, Structure summary
  • Version 3.1: 2023-12-20
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Refinement description, Structure summary