4PNG

Glutathione S-transferase from Drosophila melanogaster - isozyme E7


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.53 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.191 
  • R-Value Work: 0.158 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.160 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Comparison of epsilon- and delta-class glutathione S-transferases: the crystal structures of the glutathione S-transferases DmGSTE6 and DmGSTE7 from Drosophila melanogaster.

Scian, M.Le Trong, I.Mazari, A.M.Mannervik, B.Atkins, W.M.Stenkamp, R.E.

(2015) Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 71: 2089-2098

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1399004715013929
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    4PNF, 4PNG

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Cytosolic glutathione transferases (GSTs) comprise a large family of enzymes with canonical structures that diverge functionally and structurally among mammals, invertebrates and plants. Whereas mammalian GSTs have been characterized extensively with regard to their structure and function, invertebrate GSTs remain relatively unstudied. The invertebrate GSTs do, however, represent potentially important drug targets for infectious diseases and agricultural applications. In addition, it is essential to fully understand the structure and function of invertebrate GSTs, which play important roles in basic biological processes. Invertebrates harbor delta- and epsilon-class GSTs, which are not found in other organisms. Drosophila melanogaster GSTs (DmGSTs) are likely to contribute to detoxication or antioxidative stress during development, but they have not been fully characterized. Here, the structures of two epsilon-class GSTs from Drosophila, DmGSTE6 and DmGSTE7, are reported at 2.1 and 1.5 Å resolution, respectively, and are compared with other GSTs to identify structural features that might correlate with their biological functions. The structures of DmGSTE6 and DmGSTE7 are remarkably similar; the structures do not reveal obvious sources of the minor functional differences that have been observed. The main structural difference between the epsilon- and delta-class GSTs is the longer helix (A8) at the C-termini of the epsilon-class enzymes.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Box 357610, Seattle, WA 98195-7610, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
LD04004p
A, B
229Drosophila melanogasterMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: GstE7CG17531
UniProt
Find proteins for A1ZB72 (Drosophila melanogaster)
Explore A1ZB72 
Go to UniProtKB:  A1ZB72
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupA1ZB72
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
GSF
Query on GSF

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
C [auth A],
D [auth B]
L-GAMMA-GLUTAMYL-3-SULFINO-L-ALANYLGLYCINE
C10 H17 N3 O8 S
DMAPAHUEYHXRFI-WDSKDSINSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.53 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.191 
  • R-Value Work: 0.158 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.160 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 56.731α = 90
b = 87.09β = 90
c = 87.226γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
XDSdata reduction
REFMACrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
XSCALEdata scaling
Aimlessdata scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2015-05-27
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2015-12-16
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2017-09-27
    Changes: Derived calculations, Refinement description
  • Version 1.3: 2023-12-27
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations