3MCK

Crystal structure of anti-beta-amyloid antibody C705


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.3 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.254 
  • R-Value Work: 0.203 

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history

Literature

Antibody modeling assessment.

Almagro, J.C.Beavers, M.P.Hernandez-Guzman, F.Maier, J.Shaulsky, J.Butenhof, K.Labute, P.Thorsteinson, N.Kelly, K.Teplyakov, A.Luo, J.Sweet, R.Gilliland, G.L.

(2011) Proteins 79: 3050-3066

  • DOI: 10.1002/prot.23130
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  

  • PubMed Abstract: 
  • A blinded study to assess the state of the art in three-dimensional structure modeling of the variable region (Fv) of antibodies was conducted. Nine unpublished high-resolution x-ray Fab crystal structures covering a wide range of antigen-binding sit ...

    A blinded study to assess the state of the art in three-dimensional structure modeling of the variable region (Fv) of antibodies was conducted. Nine unpublished high-resolution x-ray Fab crystal structures covering a wide range of antigen-binding site conformations were used as benchmark to compare Fv models generated by four structure prediction methodologies. The methodologies included two homology modeling strategies independently developed by CCG (Chemical Computer Group) and Accerlys Inc, and two fully automated antibody modeling servers: PIGS (Prediction of ImmunoGlobulin Structure), based on the canonical structure model, and Rosetta Antibody Modeling, based on homology modeling and Rosetta structure prediction methodology. The benchmark structure sequences were submitted to Accelrys and CCG and a set of models for each of the nine antibody structures were generated. PIGS and Rosetta models were obtained using the default parameters of the servers. In most cases, we found good agreement between the models and x-ray structures. The average rmsd (root mean square deviation) values calculated over the backbone atoms between the models and structures were fairly consistent, around 1.2 Å. Average rmsd values of the framework and hypervariable loops with canonical structures (L1, L2, L3, H1, and H2) were close to 1.0 Å. H3 prediction yielded rmsd values around 3.0 Å for most of the models. Quality assessment of the models and the relative strengths and weaknesses of the methods are discussed. We hope this initiative will serve as a model of scientific partnership and look forward to future antibody modeling assessments.


    Organizational Affiliation

    Centocor R&D, Inc, Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087, USA. jcalmagro@hotmail.com




Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by: Sequence  |  Structure

Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetails
C705 MONOCLONAL LIGHT CHAIN
L, A
219N/AMutation(s): 0 
Protein Feature View is not available: No corresponding UniProt sequence found.
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetails
C705 MONOCLONAL HEAVY CHAIN
H, B
228N/AMutation(s): 0 
Protein Feature View is not available: No corresponding UniProt sequence found.
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChainsName / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
ACT
Query on ACT

Download SDF File 
Download CCD File 
B, H
ACETATE ION
C2 H3 O2
QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M
 Ligand Interaction
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.3 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.254 
  • R-Value Work: 0.203 
  • Space Group: C 1 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length (Å)Angle (°)
a = 172.250α = 90.00
b = 78.250β = 95.45
c = 74.630γ = 90.00
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
d*TREKdata scaling
MOLREPphasing
CrystalCleardata collection
d*TREKdata reduction
REFMACrefinement

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report or Ramachandran Plots



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History 

  • Version 1.0: 2011-02-09
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-07-13
    Type: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-08-10
    Type: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2011-11-02
    Type: Database references