3L5W

Crystal structure of the complex between IL-13 and C836 FAB


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.253 
  • R-Value Work: 0.205 

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.1 of the entry. See complete history

Literature

Human framework adaptation of a mouse anti-human IL-13 antibody.

Fransson, J.Teplyakov, A.Raghunathan, G.Chi, E.Cordier, W.Dinh, T.Feng, Y.Giles-Komar, J.Gilliland, G.Lollo, B.Malia, T.J.Nishioka, W.Obmolova, G.Zhao, S.Zhao, Y.Swanson, R.V.Almagro, J.C.

(2010) J.Mol.Biol. 398: 214-231

  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.03.004
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  

  • PubMed Abstract: 
  • Humanization of a potent neutralizing mouse anti-human IL-13 antibody (m836) using a method called human framework adaptation (HFA) is reported. HFA consists of two steps: human framework selection (HFS) and specificity-determining residue optimizati ...

    Humanization of a potent neutralizing mouse anti-human IL-13 antibody (m836) using a method called human framework adaptation (HFA) is reported. HFA consists of two steps: human framework selection (HFS) and specificity-determining residue optimization (SDRO). The HFS step involved generation of a library of m836 antigen binding sites combined with diverse human germline framework regions (FRs), which were selected based on structural and sequence similarities between mouse variable domains and a repertoire of human antibody germline genes. SDRO consisted of diversifying specificity-determining residues and selecting variants with improved affinity using phage display. HFS of m836 resulted in a 5-fold loss of affinity, whereas SDRO increased the affinity up to 100-fold compared to the HFS antibody. Crystal structures of Fabs in complex with IL-13 were obtained for m836, the HFS variant chosen for SDRO, and one of the highest-affinity SDRO variants. Analysis of the structures revealed that major conformational changes in FR-H1 and FR-H3 occurred after FR replacement, but none of them had an evident direct impact on residues in contact with IL-13. Instead, subtle changes affected the V(L)/V(H) (variable-light domain/variable-heavy domain) interface and were likely responsible for the 5-fold decreased affinity. After SDRO, increased affinity resulted mainly from rearrangements in hydrogen-bonding pattern at the antibody/antigen interface. Comparison with m836 putative germline genes suggested interesting analogies between natural affinity maturation and the engineering process that led to the potent HFA anti-human IL-13 antibody.


    Organizational Affiliation

    Centocor R&D, Inc., 3210 Merryfield Row, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.




Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by: Sequence  |  Structure

Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetails
C836 LIGHT CHAIN
L, A
214N/AMutation(s): 0 
Protein Feature View is not available: No corresponding UniProt sequence found.
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetails
C836 HEAVY CHAIN
H, B
230N/AMutation(s): 0 
Protein Feature View is not available: No corresponding UniProt sequence found.
Entity ID: 3
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetails
Interleukin-13
I, J
113Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: IL13 (NC30)
Find proteins for P35225 (Homo sapiens)
Go to Gene View: IL13
Go to UniProtKB:  P35225
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChainsName / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
GOL
Query on GOL

Download SDF File 
Download CCD File 
A
GLYCEROL
GLYCERIN; PROPANE-1,2,3-TRIOL
C3 H8 O3
PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N
 Ligand Interaction
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.253 
  • R-Value Work: 0.205 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length (Å)Angle (°)
a = 76.620α = 90.00
b = 65.560β = 107.02
c = 118.740γ = 90.00
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
d*TREKdata scaling
MOLREPphasing
CrystalCleardata collection
d*TREKdata reduction

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report or Ramachandran Plots



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History 

  • Version 1.0: 2010-04-14
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-07-13
    Type: Version format compliance