3ESK

Structure of HOP TPR2A domain in complex with the non-cognate Hsc70 peptide ligand

Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.05 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.244 
  • R-Value Work: 0.177 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.183 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history. 


Literature

Electrostatic interactions of Hsp-organizing protein tetratricopeptide domains with Hsp70 and Hsp90: computational analysis and protein engineering.

Kajander, T., Sachs, J.N., Goldman, A., Regan, L.

(2009) J Biol Chem 284: 25364-25374

  • DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.033894
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    3ESK

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    • The Hsp-organizing protein (HOP) binds to the C termini of the chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90, thus bringing them together so that substrate proteins can be passed from Hsp70 to Hsp90. Because Hsp90 is essential for the correct folding and maturation of many oncogenic proteins, it has become a significant target for anti-cancer drug design ...

    The Hsp-organizing protein (HOP) binds to the C termini of the chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90, thus bringing them together so that substrate proteins can be passed from Hsp70 to Hsp90. Because Hsp90 is essential for the correct folding and maturation of many oncogenic proteins, it has become a significant target for anti-cancer drug design. HOP binds to Hsp70 and Hsp90 via two independent tetratricopeptide (TPR) domains, TPR1 and TPR2A, respectively. We have analyzed ligand binding using Poisson-Boltzmann continuum electrostatic calculations, free energy perturbation, molecular dynamics simulations, and site-directed mutagenesis to delineate the contribution of different interactions to the affinity and specificity of the TPR-peptide interactions. We found that continuum electrostatic calculations could be used to guide protein design by removing unfavorable interactions to increase binding affinity, with an 80-fold increase in affinity for TPR2A. Contributions at buried charged residues, however, were better predicted by free energy perturbation calculations. We suggest using a combination of the two approaches for increasing the accuracy of results, with free energy perturbation calculations used only at selected buried residues of the ligand binding pocket. Finally we present the crystal structure of TPR2A in complex with its non-cognate Hsp70 ligand, which provides insight on the origins of specificity in TPR domain-peptide recognition.

    Organizational Affiliation: 

    Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA. tommi.kajander@helsinki.fi



Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by: 
(by identity cutoff)  |  Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1A129Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: STIP1
Find proteins for P31948 (Homo sapiens)
Explore P31948 
Go to UniProtKB:  P31948
NIH Common Fund Data Resources
PHAROS:  P31948
GTEx:  ENSG00000168439
Protein Feature View
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
  • Find similar proteins by:  Sequence   |   Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Heat shock cognate 71 kDa proteinB12Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: HSPA8, HSC70, HSP73, HSPA10
Find proteins for P11142 (Homo sapiens)
Explore P11142 
Go to UniProtKB:  P11142
NIH Common Fund Data Resources
PHAROS:  P11142
GTEx:  ENSG00000109971
Protein Feature View
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChainsName / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
NI
Query on NI
Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
 C [auth A]NICKEL (II) ION
Ni
VEQPNABPJHWNSG-UHFFFAOYSA-N		 Ligand Interaction
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.05 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.244 
  • R-Value Work: 0.177 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.183 
  • Space Group: C 1 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 73.459α = 90
b = 48.023β = 91.56
c = 37.896γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
HKL-2000data collection
AMoREphasing
REFMACrefinement
HKL-2000data reduction
HKL-2000data scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report


View more in-depth experimental data

Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2009-07-07
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2014-04-02
    Changes: Source and taxonomy