1R8H

Comparison of the structure and DNA binding properties of the E2 proteins from an oncogenic and a non-oncogenic human papillomavirus


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.258 
  • R-Value Work: 0.191 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.195 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Comparison of the structure and DNA-binding properties of the E2 proteins from an oncogenic and a non-oncogenic human papillomavirus.

Dell, G.Wilkinson, K.W.Tranter, R.Parish, J.Leo Brady, R.Gaston, K.

(2003) J Mol Biol 334: 979-991

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.009
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1R8H

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Human papillomaviruses (HPVS) that infect the genital tract can be divided into two groups: high-risk HPV types, such as HPV 16 and HPV 18, are associated with cancer, low-risk HPV types, such as HPV 6, are associated with benign warts. In both high-risk and low-risk HPV types, the papillomavirus E2 protein binds to four sites within the viral long control region (LCR) and regulates viral gene expression. Here, we present the crystal structure of the minimal DNA-binding domain (DBD) from the HPV 6 E2 protein. We show that the HPV 6 E2 DBD is structurally more similar to the HPV 18 and bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV1) E2 proteins than it is to the HPV 16 E2 protein. Using gel retardation assays, we show that the hierarchy of E2 sites within the HPV 16 and HPV 6 LCRs are different. However, despite these differences in structure and site preference, both the HPV 16 and 6 E2 DBDs recognise an extended version of the consensus E2 binding site derived from studies of the BPV1 E2 protein. In both cases, the preferred binding site is 5'AACCGN(4)CGGTT3', where the additional flanking base-pairs are in bold and N(4) represents a four base-pair central spacer. Both of these HPV proteins bind preferentially to E2 sites that contain an A:T-rich central spacer. We show that the preference for an A:T-rich central spacer is due, at least in part, to the need to adopt a DNA conformation that facilitates protein contacts with the flanking base-pairs.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Regulatory protein E2
A, B, C, D, E
A, B, C, D, E, F
87Human papillomavirus type 6aMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: E2
UniProt
Find proteins for Q84294 (Human papillomavirus type 6a)
Explore Q84294 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q84294
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ84294
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
PO4
Query on PO4

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
G [auth A]
H [auth A]
I [auth B]
J [auth B]
K [auth C]
G [auth A],
H [auth A],
I [auth B],
J [auth B],
K [auth C],
L [auth C],
M [auth D],
N [auth D],
O [auth D],
P [auth E],
Q [auth E],
R [auth E],
S [auth F],
T [auth F]
PHOSPHATE ION
O4 P
NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.258 
  • R-Value Work: 0.191 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.195 
  • Space Group: P 61
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 71.664α = 90
b = 71.664β = 90
c = 195.004γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
AMoREphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2003-12-23
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-29
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance