1P47 | pdb_00001p47

Crystal Structure of tandem Zif268 molecules complexed to DNA


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.267 (Depositor), 0.272 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.214 (Depositor), 0.226 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.219 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 1P47

This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history

Literature

Constraints for Zinc Finger Linker Design as Inferred from X-ray Crystal Structure of Tandem Zif268-DNA Complexes

Peisach, E.Pabo, C.O.

(2003) J Mol Biology 330: 1-7

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00572-2
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    1P47

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Zinc-finger proteins offer a versatile and effective framework for the recognition of DNA binding sites. By connecting multiple fingers together with canonical TGEKP linkers, a protein may be designed to recognize almost any desired target DNA sequence. However, proteins containing more than three zinc-fingers do not bind as tightly as one might predict, and it appears that some type of strain is introduced when a six-finger protein is constructed with canonical linkers. In an attempt to understand the sources of this strain, we have solved the 2.2A resolution X-ray crystallographic structure of a complex that has two copies of the three-finger Zif268 protein bound to adjacent sites on one duplex DNA. Conceptually, this is equivalent to a six-finger protein in which the central linker has been removed and the complex has been allowed to "relax" to its most stable conformation. As in other Zif268-DNA complexes, the DNA is approximately linear and is slightly underwound. Surprisingly, the structure of the complex is similar (within 0.5A) to an arrangement that would allow a canonical linker at the center of the complex, and it seems possible that entropic effects (involving the librational degrees of freedom in the complex) could be important in determining optimal linker length.


  • Organizational Affiliation
    • Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA. epeisach@med-xtal.bu.edu

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 34.86 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 2,433 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 215 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 218 
  • Unique protein chains: 1
  • Unique nucleic acid chains: 2

Macromolecules


Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 3
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Early growth response protein 1C [auth A],
D [auth B]
87Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: EGR1 OR EGR-1 OR KROX-24
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for P08046 (Mus musculus)
Explore P08046 
Go to UniProtKB:  P08046
IMPC:  MGI:95295
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP08046
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence
Find similar nucleic acids by:  Sequence
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains LengthOrganismImage
5'-D(*GP*TP*GP*GP*CP*GP*TP*GP*GP*GP*CP*GP*GP*CP*GP*TP*GP*GP*GP*CP*GP*T)-3'A [auth C]22N/A
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence
Find similar nucleic acids by:  Sequence
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains LengthOrganismImage
5'-D(*CP*AP*CP*GP*CP*CP*CP*AP*CP*GP*CP*CP*GP*CP*CP*CP*AP*CP*GP*CP*CP*A)-3'B [auth D]22N/A
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.267 (Depositor), 0.272 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.214 (Depositor), 0.226 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.219 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 31
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 70.629α = 90
b = 70.629β = 90
c = 99.608γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
MOLREPphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2003-06-24
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-29
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2023-08-16
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description