1FNE

HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.270 
  • R-Value Work: 0.231 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.231 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.5 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Structural and functional consequences of altering a peptide MHC anchor residue.

Kersh, G.J.Miley, M.J.Nelson, C.A.Grakoui, A.Horvath, S.Donermeyer, D.L.Kappler, J.Allen, P.M.Fremont, D.H.

(2001) J Immunol 166: 3345-3354

  • DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.5.3345
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1FNE, 1FNG

  • PubMed Abstract: 
  • To better understand TCR discrimination of multiple ligands, we have analyzed the crystal structures of two Hb peptide/I-E(k) complexes that differ by only a single amino acid substitution at the P6 anchor position within the peptide (E73D). Detailed comparison of multiple independently determined structures at 1 ...

    To better understand TCR discrimination of multiple ligands, we have analyzed the crystal structures of two Hb peptide/I-E(k) complexes that differ by only a single amino acid substitution at the P6 anchor position within the peptide (E73D). Detailed comparison of multiple independently determined structures at 1.9 A resolution reveals that removal of a single buried methylene group can alter a critical portion of the TCR recognition surface. Significant variance was observed in the peptide P5-P8 main chain as well as a rotamer difference at LeuP8, approximately 10 A distal from the substitution. No significant variations were observed in the conformation of the two MHC class II molecules. The ligand alteration results in two peptide/MHC complexes that generate bulk T cell responses that are distinct and essentially nonoverlapping. For the Hb-specific T cell 3.L2, substitution reduces the potency of the ligand 1000-fold. Soluble 3.L2 TCR binds the two peptide/MHC complexes with similar affinity, although with faster kinetics. These results highlight the role of subtle variations in MHC Ag presentation on T cell activation and signaling.


    Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Pathology and Center for Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.



Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
PROTEIN (MHC CLASS II I-EK, ALPHA CHAIN)A, C192Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
UniProt
Find proteins for P04224 (Mus musculus)
Explore P04224 
Go to UniProtKB:  P04224
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP04224
Protein Feature View
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
PROTEIN (MHC CLASS II I-EK, BETA CHAIN)B, D224Mus musculusMutation(s): 1 
Gene Names: Hbb-b2
UniProt
Find proteins for P02089 (Mus musculus)
Explore P02089 
Go to UniProtKB:  P02089
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP02089
Protein Feature View
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChainsName / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
NAG
Query on NAG

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
E [auth A],
F [auth A],
G [auth B],
H [auth C],
I [auth C],
E [auth A],
F [auth A],
G [auth B],
H [auth C],
I [auth C],
J [auth D]
2-acetamido-2-deoxy-beta-D-glucopyranose
C8 H15 N O6
OVRNDRQMDRJTHS-FMDGEEDCSA-N
 Ligand Interaction
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.270 
  • R-Value Work: 0.231 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.231 
  • Space Group: C 1 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 146.9α = 90
b = 56.853β = 91.76
c = 116.726γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
AMoREphasing
CNSrefinement

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report




Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2001-03-07
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2007-10-16
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Derived calculations, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2017-08-23
    Changes: Advisory, Refinement description, Source and taxonomy
  • Version 1.4: 2018-03-14
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.5: 2020-07-29
    Type: Remediation
    Reason: Carbohydrate remediation
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Structure summary