1FFO

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF MURINE CLASS I H-2DB COMPLEXED WITH SYNTHETIC PEPTIDE GP33 (C9M/K1A)


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.65 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.292 
  • R-Value Work: 0.246 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Peptidic termini play a significant role in TCR recognition.

Wang, B.Sharma, A.Maile, R.Saad, M.Collins, E.J.Frelinger, J.A.

(2002) J Immunol 169: 3137-3145

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.169.6.3137
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1FFN, 1FFO, 1FFP

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    TCR recognition of class I MHC is dependent on the composition of the antigenic peptide and the MHC. Single amino acid substitutions in either the MHC or the peptide may dramatically alter recognition. While the major interactions between TCR and the peptide/MHC complex appear to be focused on the complementarity-determining region (CDR)3, it is also clear from the cocrystal structure of class I MHC and TCR that the amino and carboxyl ends of the peptide may play a role through interactions with the CDR1. In this work we show that gp33 variants substituted at the peptidic termini at the putative CDR1 contact regions show improved recognition in B6 mice. The rank order of recognition is different using the P14 transgenic T cells, suggesting that one reason for improved recognition is a change in the TCR repertoire that recognizes the peptide. However, the affinity of the TCR by some of the peptide/MHC complex with increased recognition is improved, as shown by increased tetramer binding to P14 T cells. These substitutions at the termini of the peptide-binding cleft cause localized conformational changes as seen by changes in mAb binding and crystallographic structures. The different peptide structures also show different conformations in the center of the peptide, but these are shown to be energetically similar and thus most likely have no significance with respect to TCR recognition. Therefore, small conformational changes, localized to the CDR1 contact regions, may play a significant role in TCR recognition.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
H-2 CLASS I HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN, D-B, ALPHA CHAIN
A, D
273Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
UniProt
Find proteins for P01899 (Mus musculus)
Explore P01899 
Go to UniProtKB:  P01899
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP01899
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
BETA-2 MICROGLOBULIN BETA CHAIN
B, E
100Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for P01887 (Mus musculus)
Explore P01887 
Go to UniProtKB:  P01887
IMPC:  MGI:88127
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP01887
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence

Find similar proteins by:  Sequence   |   3D Structure  

Entity ID: 3
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
PEPTIDE WITH SEQUENCE ALA-ALA-VAL-TYR-ASN-PHE-ALA-THR-MET
C, F
9N/AMutation(s): 0 
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.65 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.292 
  • R-Value Work: 0.246 
  • Space Group: P 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 47.219α = 74.57
b = 68.642β = 73.08
c = 81.531γ = 69.86
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
AMoREphasing
CNSrefinement

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2002-12-11
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-27
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2017-02-01
    Changes: Structure summary
  • Version 1.4: 2024-10-09
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Structure summary