1SU5

Understanding protein lids: Structural analysis of active hinge mutants in triosephosphate isomerase


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.70 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.236 
  • R-Value Work: 0.185 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.187 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.5 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Understanding protein lids: structural analysis of active hinge mutants in triosephosphate isomerase

Kursula, I.Salin, M.Sun, J.Norledge, B.V.Haapalainen, A.M.Sampson, N.S.Wierenga, R.K.

(2004) Protein Eng Des Sel 17: 375-382

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzh048
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1SPQ, 1SQ7, 1SSD, 1SSG, 1SU5, 1SW0, 1SW3, 1SW7

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The conformational switch from open to closed of the flexible loop 6 of triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) is essential for the catalytic properties of TIM. Using a directed evolution approach, active variants of chicken TIM with a mutated C-terminal hinge tripeptide of loop 6 have been generated (Sun,J. and Sampson,N.S., Biochemistry, 1999, 38, 11474-11481). In chicken TIM, the wild-type C-terminal hinge tripeptide is KTA. Detailed enzymological characterization of six variants showed that some of these (LWA, NPN, YSL, KTK) have decreased catalytic efficiency, whereas others (KVA, NSS) are essentially identical with wild-type. The structural characterization of these six variants is reported. No significant structural differences compared with the wild-type are found for KVA, NSS and LWA, but substantial structural adaptations are seen for NPN, YSL and KTK. These structural differences can be understood from the buried position of the alanine side chain in the C-hinge position 3 in the open conformation of wild-type loop 6. Replacement of this alanine with a bulky side chain causes the closed conformation to be favored, which correlates with the decreased catalytic efficiency of these variants. The structural context of loop 6 and loop 7 and their sequence conservation in 133 wild-type sequences is also discussed.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry and Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Triosephosphate isomerase
A, B
247Gallus gallusMutation(s): 3 
Gene Names: TPI1
EC: 5.3.1.1
UniProt
Find proteins for P00940 (Gallus gallus)
Explore P00940 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00940
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00940
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 3 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
PGA
Query on PGA

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
C [auth A],
I [auth B]
2-PHOSPHOGLYCOLIC ACID
C2 H5 O6 P
ASCFNMCAHFUBCO-UHFFFAOYSA-N
SO4
Query on SO4

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
D [auth A]
E [auth A]
F [auth A]
G [auth A]
J [auth B]
D [auth A],
E [auth A],
F [auth A],
G [auth A],
J [auth B],
K [auth B],
L [auth B],
M [auth B],
N [auth B]
SULFATE ION
O4 S
QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L
GOL
Query on GOL

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
H [auth A],
O [auth B],
P [auth B]
GLYCEROL
C3 H8 O3
PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.70 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.236 
  • R-Value Work: 0.185 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.187 
  • Space Group: P 41 21 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 86.756α = 90
b = 86.756β = 90
c = 163.376γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
MAR345data collection
SCALEPACKdata scaling
AMoREphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2004-08-24
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-29
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Advisory, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2017-10-11
    Changes: Refinement description
  • Version 1.4: 2021-11-10
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.5: 2023-10-25
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description