Crystal structure of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase complexed with fructose 2,6-bisphosphate, AMP, and Zn2+ at 2.0-A resolution: aspects of synergism between inhibitors.Xue, Y., Huang, S., Liang, J.Y., Zhang, Y., Lipscomb, W.N.
(1994) Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 91: 12482-12486
- PubMed: 7809062
- PubMed Abstract:
- Conformational Transition of Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphatase: Structure Comparison between the AMP Complex (T Form) and the Fructose 6-Phosphate Complex (R Form)
Ke, H.,Liang, J.-Y.,Zhang, Y.,Lipscomb, W.N.
(1991) Biochemistry 30: 4412
- Crystallographic Studies of the Catalytic Mechanism of the Neutral Form of Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase
Zhang, Y.,Liang, J.-Y.,Huang, S.,Ke, H.,Lipscomb, W.N.
(1993) Biochemistry 32: 1844
- Crystal Structure of the Neutral Form of Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphatase Complexed with Regulatory Inhibitor Fructose 2,6-Bisphosphate at 2.6 Angstroms Resolution
Liang, J.-Y.,Huang, S.,Zhang, Y.,Ke, H.,Lipscomb, W.N.
(1992) Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 89: 2404
The crystal structure of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (Fru-1,6-Pase; EC 126.96.36.199) complexed with Zn2+ and two allosteric regulators, AMP and fructose 2,6-bisphosphate (Fru-2,6-P2) has been determined at 2.0-A resolution. In the refined model, the crys ...
The crystal structure of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (Fru-1,6-Pase; EC 188.8.131.52) complexed with Zn2+ and two allosteric regulators, AMP and fructose 2,6-bisphosphate (Fru-2,6-P2) has been determined at 2.0-A resolution. In the refined model, the crystallographic R factor is 0.189 with rms deviations of 0.014 A and 2.8 degrees from ideal geometries for bond lengths and bond angles, respectively. A 15 degrees rotation is observed between the upper dimer C1C2 and the lower dimer C3C4 relative to the R-form structure (fructose 6-phosphate complex), consistent with that expected from a T-form structure. The major difference between the structure of the previously determined Fru-2,6-P2 complex (R form) and that of the current quaternary T-form complex lies in the active site domain. A zinc binding site distinct from the three binding sites established earlier was identified within each monomer. Helix H4 (residues 123-127) was found to be better defined than in previously studied ligated Fru-1,6-Pase structures. Interactions between monomers in the active site domain were found involving H4 residues from one monomer and residues Tyr-258 and Arg-243 from the adjacent monomer. Cooperativity between AMP and Fru-2,6-P2 in signal transmission probably involves the following features: an AMP site, the adjacent B3 strand (residues 113-118), the metal site, the immediate active site, the short helix H4 (residues 123-127), and Tyr-258 and Arg-243 from the adjacent monomer within the upper (or lower) dimer. The closest distance between the immediate active site and that on the adjacent monomer is only 5 A. Thus, the involvement of H4 in signal transmission adds another important pathway to the scheme of the allosteric mechanism of Fru-1,6-Pase.
Gibbs Chemical Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.