1OT4

Solution structure of Cu(II)-CopC from Pseudomonas syringae


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: SOLUTION NMR
  • Conformers Calculated: 400 
  • Conformers Submitted: 35 
  • Selection Criteria: target function 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

A Strategy for the NMR Characterization of Type II Copper(II) Proteins: the Case of the Copper Trafficking Protein CopC from Pseudomonas Syringae.

Arnesano, F.Banci, L.Bertini, I.Felli, I.C.Luchinat, C.Thompsett, A.R.

(2003) J Am Chem Soc 125: 7200-7208

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja034112c
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1OT4

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    CopC from Pseudomonas syringae was found to be a protein capable of binding both Cu(I) and Cu(II) at two different sites. The solution structure of the apo protein is available, and structural information has been obtained on the Cu(I) bound form. We attempt here to set the limits for the determination of the solution structure of a Cu(II) protein, such as the Cu(II) bound form of CopC, in which the Cu(II) ion takes a type II coordination. The electron relaxation time is estimated from NMRD measurements to be 3 ns which leads to a correlation time for the nuclear spin-electron spin dipolar interaction of 2 ns. This information allowed us to tailor the NMR experiments and to fully exploit purely heteronuclear spectroscopy to assign as many signals as possible. In this way, 37 (13)C and 11 (15)N signals that completely escape detection with conventional approaches were assigned. Paramagnetic based structural constraints were obtained by measuring paramagnetic longitudinal relaxation enhancements (rho(para)) which allowed us to precisely locate the copper ion within the protein frame. Pseudocontact shifts (pcs's) were also used as constraints for 83 (1)H and 18 (13)C nuclei. With them, together with other standard structural constraints, a structure is obtained (and submitted to PDB) where information is only missing in a sphere with a 6 A radius from the copper ion. If we borrow information from EXAFS data, which show evidence of two copper coordinated histidines, then His 1 and His 91 are unambiguously identified as copper ligands. EXAFS data indicate two more light donor atoms (O/N) which could be from Asp 27 and Glu 89, whereas the NMRD data indicate the presence of a semicoordinated water molecule at 2.8 A (Cu-O distance) roughly orthogonal to the plane identified by the other four ligands. This represents the most extensively characterized structure of a type II Cu(II) protein obtained employing the most advanced NMR methods and with the aid of EXAFS data. The knowledge of the location of the Cu(II) in the protein is important for the copper transfer mechanism.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    CERM, University of Florence, Via Luigi Sacconi 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Copper resistance protein C102Pseudomonas syringaeMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: COPC
UniProt
Find proteins for Q4ZWC7 (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (strain B728a))
Explore Q4ZWC7 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q4ZWC7
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ4ZWC7
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
CU
Query on CU

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
B [auth A]COPPER (II) ION
Cu
JPVYNHNXODAKFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: SOLUTION NMR
  • Conformers Calculated: 400 
  • Conformers Submitted: 35 
  • Selection Criteria: target function 

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2003-07-08
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-29
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2022-02-23
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations