1N5H

Solution structure of the cathelin-like domain of protegrins (the R87-P88 and D118-P119 amide bonds are in the cis conformation)


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: SOLUTION NMR
  • Conformers Calculated: 60 
  • Conformers Submitted: 15 
  • Selection Criteria: structures with the least restraint violations 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

NMR Structure of the Cathelin-like domain of the protegrin-3 Precursor

Yang, Y.Sanchez, J.F.Strub, M.P.Brutscher, B.Aumelas, A.

(2003) Biochemistry 42: 4669-4680

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi027133c
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1N5H, 1N5P

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    In mammals, numerous precursors of antibacterial peptides with unrelated sequences share a similar prosequence of 94-114 residues, termed the cathelin-like domain. The cathelin-like domain of protegrin-3 (ProS) was overexpressed in Escherichia coli and uniformly labeled with (15)N or (15)N and (13)C, and its three-dimensional structure was determined by heteronuclear NMR at pH 6.2. Under these conditions and due to the cis-trans isomerization of the R(87)-P(88) and D(118)-P(119) amide bonds, the ProS structure was found to adopt four almost equally populated conformations in slow exchange on the NMR chemical shift time scale. The ProS structure consists of an N-terminal alpha-helix (Y(34)-N(48)) cradled by a four-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet (beta1, N(53)-L(60); beta2, K(74)-P(86); beta3, V(104)-V(111); and beta4, I(122)-C(124)). The solution structure of ProS, which is monomeric, allowed us to determine the structure of the L1 and L2 loops, which are too mobile in the crystal structure. The regions common to the solution and X-ray structures were found to be very similar. Finally, since the overall fold of ProS is very similar to that of cystatins despite a low degree of sequence identity, the ProS solution structure was compared to the solution and X-ray structures of the chicken cystatin. This comparison revealed that the structures of the L1 and L2 loops as well as that of the appending domain are quite different in the two proteins. These differences are mainly due to the high proline residue content (10%) which disorganizes the hydrogen bond network of a part of the ProS beta-sheet in contrast to that of the chicken cystatin structure.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Centre de Biochimie Structurale, UMR 5048 CNRS-UM1/UMR 554 INSERM-UM1, Université Montpellier 1, Faculté de Pharmacie, 15 avenue Charles Flahault, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
protegrins105Sus scrofaMutation(s): 0 
UniProt
Find proteins for P49933 (Sus scrofa)
Explore P49933 
Go to UniProtKB:  P49933
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP49933
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: SOLUTION NMR
  • Conformers Calculated: 60 
  • Conformers Submitted: 15 
  • Selection Criteria: structures with the least restraint violations 

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2003-06-03
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-28
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2022-02-23
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations