SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC0.9 mM C24_I4A, 0.2 v/v DMSO, 100 mM NaCl, 0.8 v/v H2O20% DMSO/80% H2O100 mM6.51 atm298Agilent DD2 600
22D 1H-13C HSQC0.9 mM C24_I4A, 0.2 v/v DMSO, 100 mM NaCl, 0.8 v/v H2O20% DMSO/80% H2O100 mM6.51 atm298Agilent DD2 600
32D 1H-1H TOCSY0.9 mM C24_I4A, 0.2 v/v DMSO, 100 mM NaCl, 0.8 v/v H2O20% DMSO/80% H2O100 mM6.51 atm298Agilent DD2 600
42D 1H-1H NOESY0.9 mM C24_I4A, 0.2 v/v DMSO, 100 mM NaCl, 0.8 v/v H2O20% DMSO/80% H2O100 mM6.51 atm298Agilent DD2 600
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1AgilentDD2600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingX-PLOR NIH
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number200
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementCNSBrunger A. T. et.al.
2structure calculationARIALinge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
3chemical shift assignmentCcpNmr AnalysisCCPN
4processingNMRPipeDelaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
5refinementX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore