SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC0.8 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] relaxed pUb90% H2O/10% D2O150 mM7.4760 mmHg298Bruker AVANCE III 600
23D CBCA(CO)NH0.8 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] relaxed pUb90% H2O/10% D2O150 mM7.4760 mmHg298Bruker AVANCE III 850
33D HNCA0.8 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] relaxed pUb90% H2O/10% D2O150 mM7.4760 mmHg298Bruker AVANCE III 850
43D 1H-15N NOESY0.8 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] relaxed pUb90% H2O/10% D2O150 mM7.4760 mmHg298Bruker AVANCE III 850
53D 1H-13C NOESY0.8 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] relaxed pUb90% H2O/10% D2O150 mM7.4760 mmHg298Bruker AVANCE III 850
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE III600
2BrukerAVANCE III850
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingX-PLOR NIH
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number160
Conformers Submitted Total Number30
Representative Model1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
2structure calculationX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
3chemical shift assignmentCcpNMRCCPN
4peak pickingCcpNMRCCPN