| simulated annealing | THE STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SIMULATED
ANNEALING PROTOCOL OF NILGES ET AL. (1988) FEBS LETT. 229,
129-136 USING THE PROGRAM X-PLOR 3.1 (BRUNGER) MODIFIED TO
INCORPORATE COUPLING CONSTANT (GARRETT ET AL. (1984) J.
MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 104, 99-103) AND CARBON CHEMICAL
SHIFT (KUSZEWSKI ET AL. (1995) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B
106, 92-96) RESTRAINTS, AND T1/T2 RESTRAINTS
(TJANDRA ET AL. NATURE STRUCT. BIOL. 4, 443-449, 1997).
IN THIS ENTRY THE LAST COLUMN REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE RMS
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL SIMULATED ANNEALING
STRUCTURES AND THE MEAN COORDINATE POSITIONS. THE LAST
COLUMN IN THE INDIVIDUAL SA STRUCTURES HAS NO MEANING.
BEST FITTING TO GENERATE THE AVERAGE STRUCTURE IS WITH
RESPECT TO RESIDUES 1 - 246 (RESIDUES 250 - 259 ARE
DISORDERED IN SOLUTION).
THE DIFFUSION AXIS IS REPRESENTED BY A LINE CONNECTING THE
FOLLOWING POINTS:
MODEL 1
P1 99.496 -5.388 4.259
P2 100.996 -5.522 4.494
MODEL 2
P1 98.788 -8.987 5.732
P2 100.276 -9.158 6.005
MODEL 3
P1 99.434 -4.307 5.171
P2 100.913 -4.485 5.479
MODEL 4
P1 98.451 -9.432 11.021
P2 99.937 -9.664 11.263
MODEL 5
P1 98.767 -8.960 4.411
P2 100.260 -9.156 4.635
MODEL 6
P1 99.248 -6.533 6.790
P2 100.732 -6.751 7.054
MODEL 7
P1 98.875 -10.180 3.464
P2 100.357 -10.334 3.776
MODEL 8
P1 97.923 -10.162 13.940
P2 99.409 -10.421 14.154
MODEL 9
P1 99.582 -4.741 4.131
P2 101.088 -4.915 4.285
MODEL 10
P1 98.768 -9.128 7.223
P2 100.256 -9.280 7.504
MODEL 11
P1 99.573 -2.947 5.813
P2 101.060 -3.111 6.100
MODEL 12
P1 99.760 -1.351 2.531
P2 101.255 -1.535 2.751
MODEL 13
P1 99.373 -4.422 5.924
P2 100.867 -4.570 6.179
MODEL 14
P1 99.181 -5.648 3.682
P2 100.678 -5.875 3.832 | X-PLOR |
