SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 2 | 3D HNCA | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 3 | 3D HNCO | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 4 | 3D HCACO | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 5 | 3D HNCACB | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 6 | 3D HCCH-TOCSY | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 7 | 3D C(CO)NH | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 8 | 3D H(CCO)NH | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 9 | 3D HNHB | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 10 | 3D 1H-15N NOESY | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 11 | 3D 1H-13C NOESY | 0.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 12 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 0.3 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein, 0.3 mM protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| 13 | 2D 1H-1H NOESY | 0.3 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] protein, 0.3 mM protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 4 | ambient | 298 | |
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | AVANCE | 600 |
| 2 | Varian | AVANCE | 500 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| simulated annealing, molecular dynamics | Initial structures calculated by minimizing target function. Final CYANA structure refined in explicit water using molecular dynamics. | NMRPipe |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | structures with the lowest energy |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
| Representative Model | 1 (closest to the average) |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | processing | NMRPipe | Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax | |
| 2 | data analysis | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
| 3 | chemical shift assignment | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
| 4 | peak picking | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
| 5 | chemical shift calculation | CYANA | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich | |
| 6 | structure solution | CYANA | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich | |
| 7 | structure solution | X-PLOR NIH | Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore | |
| 8 | refinement | X-PLOR NIH | Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore | |
| 9 | refinement | WHAT IF | Vriend | |
| 10 | refinement | CYANA | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich | |














