2M9X
Solution NMR Structure of Microtubule-associated serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 from Homo sapiens, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) Target HR9151A
SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
1 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
2 | 2D 1H-13C CT HSQC aliphatic | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
3 | 3D HNCO | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
4 | 3D CBCA(CO)NH | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
5 | 3D HNCACB | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
6 | 2D 1H-13C CT HSQC aromatic | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
7 | 3D simutaneous 13C-aromatic,13C-aliphatic,15N edited 1H-1H NOESY | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
8 | 3D HCCH-TOCSY | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
9 | 3D HBHA(CO)NH | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
10 | 3D HN(CA)CO | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
11 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC_wide | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
12 | 3D (H)CCH-COSYali | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
13 | 3D (H)CCH-COSYaro | 0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 | ||
14 | 2D 1H-13C HSQC methyl | 0.39 mM [%5-13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 7.5 | ambient | 283 |
NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
1 | Varian | INOVA | 750 |
NMR Refinement | ||
---|---|---|
Method | Details | Software |
simulated annealing | Structure was calculated by running CYANA and ASDP in parallel using NOE-based constraints and phi and psi dihedral angle constraints derived from Talos+. Consensus peak assignments were selected and used in iterative refinement with CYANA. The 20 conformers out of 100 with the lowest target function were further refined by simulated annealing in explicit water bath using the program CNS with PARAM19 force field. | CNS |
NMR Ensemble Information | |
---|---|
Conformer Selection Criteria | structures with the lowest energy |
Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
Representative Model | 1 (lowest energy) |
Computation: NMR Software | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
1 | refinement | CNS | 1.3 | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read |
2 | structure solution | CNS | 1.3 | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read |
3 | geometry optimization | CNS | 1.3 | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read |
4 | refinement | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
5 | geometry optimization | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
6 | structure solution | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
7 | data analysis | AutoStructure | 2.1 | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione |
8 | refinement | AutoStructure | 2.1 | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione |
9 | data analysis | AutoAssign | 2.3.1 | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |
10 | chemical shift assignment | AutoAssign | 2.3.1 | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |
11 | data analysis | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
12 | peak picking | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
13 | chemical shift assignment | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
14 | collection | VnmrJ | 2.2D | Varian |
15 | geometry optimization | TALOS+ | Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax | |
16 | structure validation | PSVS | 1.4 | Bhattacharya, Montelione |
17 | data analysis | CARA | 1.8.4 | Keller and Wuthrich |
18 | peak picking | CARA | 1.8.4 | Keller and Wuthrich |
19 | chemical shift assignment | CARA | 1.8.4 | Keller and Wuthrich |
20 | processing | PROSA | Guntert | |
21 | data analysis | CSI | Wishart and Sykes |