NMR Solution Structure of a Putative Uncharacterized Protein obtained from Arabidopsis thaliana: Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium target AR3449A
SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 3D 1H-15N NOESY | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 2 | 3D 1H-13C aliphatic NOESY | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 3 | 3D 1H-13C aromatic NOESY | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 4 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 5 | 2D 1H-13C HSQC | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 6 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 7 | 2D 1H-13C HSQC | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 8 | 3D HBHA(CO)NH | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 9 | 3D CBCA(CO)NH | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 10 | (4,3)D GFT-HNNCABCA | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 11 | (4,3)D GFT-CABCA(CO)NHN | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 12 | 3D HNCO | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 13 | 3D HNCA | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 14 | 3D HNCACB | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 15 | 3D H(CCO)NH | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 16 | 3D HCCH-TOCSY | 1.11 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| 17 | 3D HNHA | 1.22 mM [U-10% 13C; U-100% 15N] AR3449A | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 5mM CaCl2, 10mM NaCl | 6.5 | ambient | 293 | |
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | AVANCE | 800 |
| 2 | Varian | INOVA | 600 |
| 3 | Varian | INOVA | 500 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| simulated annealing | The structure was obtained using triple resonance NMR spectroscopy. GFT-NMR experiments were used for backbone assignments. Automated NOESY assignments were made using AUTOSTRUCTURE and CYANA-2.1. Dihedral angle constraints were obteined from TALOS. The assignments were validated using AVS software. FInal structure factors determined using PSVS: ordered residues: alpha helices- 33.44, 67-70, beta strands- 22-27, 11-17, 78-82, 51-55, 58-59. Ramachandran statistics for ordered residues: 89.1% most favoured regions, 10.9% additionally favoured regions. Procheck scores for ordered residues (RAW/Z): phi/psi -0.43/-1.38, all -0.18/-1.06, MolProbity clashscores- 21.46/-2.16. RPF score for goodness fit to the NOESY data: Recall-0.998, Precision-0.93, final dp-score-0.869 | CNS |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | structures with the lowest energy |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
| Representative Model | 1 (lowest energy) |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | refinement | CNS | 2.0.6 | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read |
| 2 | structure solution | AutoStructure | 2.2.1 | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione |
| 3 | structure solution | CYANA | 2.1 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
| 4 | chemical shift assignment | AutoAssign | 2.4.0 | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |














