SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 2 | 3D HNCACB | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 3 | 3D CBCA(CO)NH | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 4 | 3D HBHA(CBCACO)NH | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 5 | 3D HN(CA)HA | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 6 | 3D 1H-15N NOESY | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 7 | 3D 1H-13C NOESY | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 8 | 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 9 | 3D HCCH-TOCSY | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 10 | 3D HCCH-TOCSY | 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| 11 | 2D 1H-13C HSQC constant time | 0.5 mM [U-10% 13C; U-100% 15N] NapD, mM , mM , mM | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 7.4 | 298 | |||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Varian | INOVA | 600 |
| 2 | Varian | INOVA | 800 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| simulated annealing, molecular dynamics | Distance restraints were derived using AtnosCandid automated NOE assignment procedures. Restraints were loosened with 0.2Angstrom upper bound correction and used to calculate 100 structures using simulated annealing in XPLOR-NIH, followed by refinement in explicit solvent. | XEASY |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | lowest restraint energy |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
| Representative Model | 1 (lowest restraint energy) |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | data analysis | XEASY | C Bartels et al. | |
| 2 | data analysis | AtnosCandid | Herrmann, T., G ntert, P. & W thrich, K. | |
| 3 | structure solution | CYANA | P Guntert, C Mumenthaler and K Wuthrich | |
| 4 | refinement | X-PLOR NIH | CD Schwieters, JJ Kuszewski, N Tjandra and GM Clore | |
| 5 | refinement | WHAT IF | G Vriend | |
| 6 | refinement | YASARA | E. Krieger, Yasara Biosciences | |














