SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 3D_15N-separated_NOESY | 1mM 15N,13C-labeled Ede1 UBA; 1mM Ubiquitin; 20mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 2mM DTT, 0.2% NaN3, 90% H2O, 10% D2O | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 20mM Sodium Phosphate | 6.0 | 1 atm | 298 | |
| 2 | 3D_13C-separated_NOESY | 1mM 15N,13C-labeled Ede1 UBA; 1mM Ubiquitin; 20mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 2mM DTT, 0.2% NaN3 | 100% D2O | 20mM Sodium Phosphate | 6.0 | 1 atm | 298 | |
| 3 | 3D_15N-separated_NOESY | 1mM Ede1 UBA; 1mM 15N,13C-labeled Ubiquitin; 20mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 2mM DTT, 0.2% NaN3, 90% H2O, 10% D2O | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 20mM Sodium Phosphate | 6.0 | 1 atm | 298 | |
| 4 | 3D_13C-separated_NOESY | 1mM Ede1 UBA; 1mM 15N,13C-labeled Ubiquitin; 20mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 2mM DTT, 0.2% NaN3 | 100% D2O | 20mM Sodium Phosphate | 6.0 | 1 atm | 298 | |
| 5 | 3D_13C-separated_12C-edited_NOESY | 1mM 15N,13C-labeled Ede1 UBA; 1mM Ubiquitin; 20mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 2mM DTT, 0.2% NaN3 | 100% D2O | 20mM Sodium Phosphate | 6.0 | 1 atm | 298 | |
| 6 | 3D_13C-separated_12C-edited_NOESY | 1mM Ede1 UBA; 1mM 15N,13C-labeled Ubiquitin; 20mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 2mM DTT, 0.2% NaN3 | 100% D2O | 20mM Sodium Phosphate | 6.0 | 1 atm | 298 | |
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Varian | INOVA | 600 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| Torsion angle dynamics and simulated annealing | THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 2489 DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, INCLUDING 2489 NOE-DERIVED DISTANCE RESTRAINTS [2069 UNAMBIGUOUS AND 420 AMBIGUOUS RESTRAINTS], 74 HYDROGEN BONDING DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, AND 161 TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS. | CNS |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | The submitted conformers are the 20 structures with the lowest restraint energies, restraint violations, and RMS deviations from ideal covalent geometry |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 80 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
| Representative Model | 1 (closest to the average) |
| Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
|---|---|
| Details | Additional experiments: 2D Double half filtered NOESY was performed for both D2O and H2O samples |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | refinement | CNS | 1.1 | Brunger et al. |
| 2 | refinement | ARIA | 1.2 | Linge and Nilges |
| 3 | data analysis | Felix | 98.0 | Accelrys |














