1YUI

SOLUTION NMR STRUCTURE OF THE GAGA FACTOR/DNA COMPLEX, REGULARIZED MEAN STRUCTURE


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
1TRIPLE RESONANCE 6.00303.50
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAMX500500
2BrukerAMX600600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingTHE 3D STRUCTURE OF THE GAGA FACTOR/DNA COMPLEX WAS SOLVED BY MULTI-DIMENSIONAL HETERONUCLEAR-EDITED AND -FILTERED NMR AND IS BASED ON 1475 EXPERIMENTAL NMR RESTRAINTS: (A) INTRAPROTEIN: 188 SEQUENTIAL (|I- J|=1), 134 MEDIUM RANGE (1 < |I-J| <=5) AND 95 LONG RANGE (|I-J| >5) INTERRESIDUES AND 275 INTRARESIDUE APPROXIMATE INTERPROTON DISTANCE RESTRAINTS; 140 TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS; 33 THREE-BOND HN-HA COUPLING CONSTANT RESTRAINTS; AND 94 (48 CALPHA AND 46 CBETA) 13C SHIFT RESTRAINTS. (NUMBERS OF RESIDUES 10 - 61) (B) INTRA-DNA: 124 INTRARESIDUE, 112 SEQUENTIAL INTRASTRAND, 21 INTERSTRAND INTERPROTON DISTANCE RESTRAINTS; 102 TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS (FOR ALPHA, BETA, GAMMA, DELTA, EPSILON AND AND ZETA BACKBONE TORSION ANGLES). (C) INTERMOLECULAR: 75 INTERPROTON DISTANCE RESTRAINTS. THE EXPERIMENTAL NMR RESTRAINTS ARE SUPPLEMENTED BY HYDROGEN BONDING RESTRAINTS: 24 DISTANCES FOR 12 BACKBONE HYDROGEN BONDS WITHIN THE PROTEIN, 58 DISTANCES FOR WATSON-CRICK BASE-PAIRING WITHIN THE DNA, AND 10 AMBIGUOUS DISTANCE RESTRAINTS BETWEEN THE PROTEIN AND THE DNA. THE RESTRAINTS HAVE BEEN DEPOSITED. THE STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL OF NILGES ET AL. (1988) FEBS LETT. 229, 129-136 USING THE PROGRAM X-PLOR 3.1 (BRUNGER) MODIFIED TO INCORPORATE COUPLING CONSTANT (GARRETT ET AL. (1984) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 104, 99-103) AND CARBON CHEMICAL SHIFT (KUSZEWSKI ET AL. (1995) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 106, 92-96) RESTRAINTS, AND A CONFORMATIONAL DATABASE POTENTIAL (KUSZEWSKI ET AL.(1996) PROTEIN SCI. 5, 1067-1080 THE RESTRAINED REGULARIZED MEAN STRUCTURE IS PRESENTED IN THIS ENTRY AND 50 STRUCTURES ARE PRESENTED IN ENTRY 1YUJ. IN THE RESTRAINED REGULARIZED MEAN COORDINATES THE LAST COLUMN REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE RMS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL SIMULATED ANNEALING STRUCTURES AND THE MEAN COORDINATE POSITIONS. THE LAST COLUMN IN THE INDIVIDUAL SA STRUCTURES HAS NO MEANING. BEST FITTING TO GENERATE THE AVERAGE STRUCTURE IS WITH RESPECT TO RESIDUES 14 - 58 OF THE PROTEIN AND BASE PAIRS 1 - 11 OF THE DNA (RESIDUES 10 - 13 AND 59 - 61 ARE DISORDERED IN SOLUTION). RESIDUE 10 CORRESPONDS TO RESIDUE 319 OF THE NATURAL SEQUENCE. NOTE THE OCCUPANCY FIELD HAS NO MEANING.X-PLOR (SEE ABOVE)
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection CriteriaREGULARIZED MEAN STRUCTURE
Conformers Calculated Total Number
Conformers Submitted Total Number1
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsTRIPLE RESONANCE FOR ASSIGNMENT OF PROTEIN 12C- FILTERED NOE, 12C-FILTERED HOHAHA AND 1H-1H NOE FOR DNA. QUANTITATIVE J CORRELATION FOR COUPLING CONSTANTS 3D 15N- SEPARATED, 3D 13C-SEPARATED, 3D 12C-FILTERED 3D 13C- SEPARATED/12C-FILTERED, AND 2D 1H-1H NOE EXPERIMENTS.
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1structure solutionX-PLOR (SEE ABOVE)
2refinementX-PLOR (SEE ABOVE)