☰ Navigation Tabs
Solution Structure of chick cofilin
NMR Experiment Experiment Type Sample Contents Solvent Ionic Strength pH Pressure Temperature (K) Spectrometer 1 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 100% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298 2 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 93% H2O, 7% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298 3 HNHA 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 93% H2O, 7% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298 4 HNHB 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 93% H2O, 7% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298 5 3D HNCACB 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 93% H2O, 7% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298 6 3D CBCA(CO)NH 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 93% H2O, 7% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298 7 3D HC(CO)NH-TOCSY 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 93% H2O, 7% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298 8 3D C(CO)NH-TOCSY 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 93% H2O, 7% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298 9 3D HCCH-TOCSY 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 100% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298 10 3D HCCH-COSY 1 mM U-15N,13C cofilin; 50 mM KCl; 10 mM PIPES; 0.02% NaN3; pH 6.8 100% D2O 0.06 6.8 ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength 1 Varian INOVA 500 2 Varian INOVA 600
NMR Refinement Method Details Software torsion angle dynamics followed by simulated annealing NMRPipe
NMR Ensemble Information Conformer Selection Criteria Structures with lowest energy, best covalent geometry, and least restraint violations Conformers Calculated Total Number 50 Conformers Submitted Total Number 20 Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software # Classification Version Software Name Author 1 processing NMRPipe 1.0 Frank Delaglio and Ad Bax 2 data analysis XEASY 1.2 Tai-he Xia and Christian Bartels 3 structure solution DYANA 1.5 Peter Guntert 4 refinement X-PLOR 3.1 Axel Brunger