1R9K | pdb_00001r9k

Representative solution structure of the catalytic domain of SopE2

SOLUTION NMR

---

NMR Experiment
Experiment	Type	Sample Contents	Solvent	Ionic Strength	pH	Pressure	Temperature (K)	Spectrometer
1	2D NOESY	1mM SopE2 unlabelled; 20mM tris buffer; 99.6% D2O	99.6% D2O	0	7	ambient	298
2	2D TOCSY	1mM SopE2 unlabelled; 20mM tris buffer; 99.6% D2O	99.6% D2O	0	7	ambient	298
3	3D_13C-separated_NOESY	1mM SopE2 U-15N,13C; 20mM HEPES buffer; 90% H2O, 10% D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O	0	7	ambient	298
4	3D_15N-separated_NOESY	1mM SopE2 U-15N,13C; 20mM HEPES buffer; 90% H2O, 10% D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O	0	7	ambient	298
5	HNHA	1mM SopE2 U-15N; 20mM HEPES buffer; 90% H2O, 10% D2O	90% H2O/10% D2O	0	7	ambient	298

NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer	Manufacturer	Model	Field Strength
1	Varian	INOVA	600

NMR Refinement
Method	Details	Software
simulated annealing	he structures are based on a total of 3065 restraints, 2682 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 249 dihedral angle restraints,134 distance restraints from hydrogen bonds.	NMRPipe

NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria	structures with acceptable covalent geometry,structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number	100
Conformers Submitted Total Number	1
Representative Model	1 (closest to the average)

Additional NMR Experimental Information
Details	The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy.

Computation: NMR Software
#	Classification	Version	Software Name	Author
1	processing	NMRPipe	2.1	Delaglio et al
2	data analysis	Sparky	3.1	Goddard & kneller
3	structure solution	XPLOR-NIH	2.06	Schwieters et al
4	refinement	XPLOR-NIH	2.06	Schwieters et al