SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | NOESY | 3. | 293 | |||||
| 2 | TOCSY | 3. | 293 | |||||
| 3 | DQF-COSY | 3. | 293 | |||||
| 4 | E-COSY | 3. | 293 | |||||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | ARX | 500 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| MD/SIMULATED ANNEALING | CHARM22 A TOTAL OF 50 INITIAL STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING A SIMULATED ANNEALING PROGRAM AS SUPPLIED WITH X-PLOR 3.1. THE FINAL 20 STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST OVERALL ENERGIES AND FEWEST VIOLATIONS OF NOE AND DIHEDRAL RESTRAINTS WERE ENERGY MINIMIZED IN X-PLOR USING THE CHARMM FORCEFIELD [BROOKS ET AL. (1983) J. COMPUT. CHEM., VOL. 4 187-217.] | X-PLOR |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | LOW E AND FEW VIOLATIONS OF EXPERIMENTAL RESTRAINTS |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 50 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 15 |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | refinement | X-PLOR | 3.1 | BRUNGER |
| 2 | structure solution | X-PLOR | ||
