1MM3

Solution structure of the 2nd PHD domain from Mi2b with C-terminal loop replaced by corresponding loop from WSTF


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D NOESY1mM Mi2-phd2-L2wstf protein, 1mM DTT, 10mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 150mM NaCl, 95% H2O, 5% D2O95% H2O/5% D2O150mM NaCl7.5ambient298
22D TOCSY1mM Mi2-phd2-L2wstf protein, 1mM DTT, 10mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 150mM NaCl, 95% H2O, 5% D2O95% H2O/5% D2O150mM NaCl7.5ambient298
3DQF-COSY1mM Mi2-phd2-L2wstf protein, 1mM DTT, 10mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 150mM NaCl, 95% H2O, 5% D2O95% H2O/5% D2O150mM NaCl7.5ambient298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerDRX600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, torsion angle dynamicsStructure calculations were performed using the package ARIA1.1 (Ambiguous Restraints in Iterative Assignment). Final structures are based on 968 unambiguous NOE-derived distance constraints, 90 sets of ambiguous NOE-derived distance constraints and 37 additional dihedral angle restraints.XwinNMR
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number500
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsThis structure was determined mostly using standard 2D homonuclear techniques
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1processingXwinNMR2.5Bruker
2data analysisXEASY1.3.13Bartels et al
3refinementDYANA1.5Guntert et al
4structure solutionARIA1.1.2Linge et al