SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D NOESY | 6mM cytochrome c, 1.2M Imidazole | H2O | 5.7 | 1 atm | 313 | ||
| 2 | 2D NOESY | 6mM cytochrome c, 1.2M Imidazole | D2O | 5.7 | 1 atm | 313 | ||
| 3 | DQF-COSY | 6mM cytochrome c, 1.2M Imidazole | H2O | 5.7 | 1 atm | 313 | ||
| 4 | DQF-COSY | 6mM cytochrome c, 1.2M Imidazole | D2O | 5.7 | 1 atm | 313 | ||
| 5 | TOCSY | 6mM cytochrome c, 1.2M Imidazole | H2O | 5.7 | 1 atm | 313 | ||
| 6 | TOCSY | 6mM cytochrome c, 1.2M Imidazole | D2O | 5.7 | 1 atm | 313 | ||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | AMX | 600 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| AMBER | OTHER REFINEMENT REMARKS: DYNAMICS SIMULATED ANNEALING,RESTRAINED ENERGY MINIMIZATION; PSEUDOCONTACT SHIFTS WERE USED IN THE CALCULATION AND IN THE MINIMIZATION AS FURTHER NON-CLASSICAL CONSTRAINTS | DYANA |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 1 |
| Representative Model | (minimized average structure) |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | structure solution | DYANA | 5.0 | Wuthrich et al |
| 2 | structure solution | PSEUDODYANA | 5.0 | Banci et al |
| 3 | refinement | Amber | 5.0 | PEARLMAN, CASE, CALDWELL, ROSS, CHEATHAM, FERGUSON, SEIBEL, SINGH, WEINER, KOLLMAN |
| 4 | refinement | PSEUDOREM | 5.0 | BANCI, BERTINI, GORI SAVELLINI, ROMAGNOLI, TURANO, CREMONINI, LUCHINAT,GARY |
