SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D NOESY | 0.8mM d(TpApCpG); 20mM Tris-Cl, 6.7mM MgCl2, 150mM NaCl | D2O | 6.7mM MgCl2, 150mM NaCl | 7.1 | ambient | 298 | |
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | AMX | 600 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| simulated annealing | X-PLOR | |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | structures with the lowest energy |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 10 |
| Representative Model | 1 (lowest energy) |
| Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
|---|---|
| Details | This structure was determined using transferred NOE techniques. THE ROOT-MEAN-SQUARE DEVIATION OF THE T-A-C REGION IS 0.30 ANGSTROM. THE FOURTH RESIDUE (G) IS DISORDERED BECAUSE OF FEW NOE CONSTRAINTS |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | structure solution | X-PLOR | 3.1 | Brunger |
| 2 | refinement | X-PLOR | 3.1 | Brunger |
