SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D NOESY | 1 MM ITP WITH 0.2 MM KLYN, PH 7.0 PHOSPHATE BUFFER | 7.0 | AMBIENT | 278 | |||
| 2 | 2D TOCSY | 1 MM ITP WITH 0.2 MM KLYN, PH 7.0 PHOSPHATE BUFFER | 7.0 | AMBIENT | 278 | |||
| 3 | 2D ROESY | 1 MM ITP WITH 0.2 MM KLYN, PH 7.0 PHOSPHATE BUFFER | 7.0 | AMBIENT | 278 | |||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Varian | UNITY | 600 |
| 2 | Varian | UNITY | 500 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| THE SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL IN THE X-PLOR 3.1 MANUAL WAS USED FOR STRUCTURE CALCULATION. RESTRAINED POWELL MINIMIZATION INCOPORATED THE CHARMM FORCE FIELD USING THE TOP_ALL22 AND PAR_ALL22 FILES IN THE X-PLOR 3.1 LIBRARY. 107 NOE DERIVED DISTANCE RESTRAINTS WERE USED THROUGH OUT THE STRUCTURE CALCULATION | X-PLOR | |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | structures with favorable non-bond energy |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 200 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 1 |
| Representative Model | (closest to the average) |
| Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
|---|---|
| Details | THIS STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING STANDARD 2D HOMONUCLEAR TECHNIQUES |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | structure solution | X-PLOR | 3.1 | BRUNGER, A.T. |
| 2 | refinement | CHARMM | 23.2 | BROOKS, B.R. ET AL. |














