SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | NOESY | WATER | LOW SALT CONDITIONS | 6.0 | 1 atm | 303 | ||
| 2 | TOCSY | WATER | LOW SALT CONDITIONS | 6.0 | 1 atm | 303 | ||
| 3 | DQF | WATER | LOW SALT CONDITIONS | 6.0 | 1 atm | 303 | ||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | AMX600 | 600 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| DYNAMICAL SIMULATED ANNEALING | THE PROTEIN PART OF THE STRUCTURE WAS FIRST GENERATED USING A RESTRAINTED DYNAMICAL ANNEALING CALCULATION. THE D(ACGCC) NUCLEIC ACID UNDER A DNA CONFORMATION WAS DOCKED APPROXIMATIVELY TO THE PROTEIN BASED ON THE 28 INTERMOLECULAR NOES. THE DOCKED STRUCTURE WAS ENERGY-MINIMIZED UNDER NOES RESTRAINTS. THIS INITIAL COMPLEXED STRUCTURE WAS THEN USED FOR A SECOND SET OF SIMULATED ANNEALING CALCULATION. | Discover |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | LEAST RESTRAINT VIOLATION AND LOWEST TOTAL ENERGY |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 50 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 10 |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | refinement | Discover | BIOSYM | |
| 2 | structure solution | BRUKER DISNMR | DISNMR | |
| 3 | structure solution | BIOSYM/MSI | ||
