5F6M

Isotropic Trypsin Model for Comparison of Diffuse Scattering


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.10 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.154 
  • R-Value Work: 0.145 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.145 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Measuring and modeling diffuse scattering in protein X-ray crystallography.

Van Benschoten, A.H.Liu, L.Gonzalez, A.Brewster, A.S.Sauter, N.K.Fraser, J.S.Wall, M.E.

(2016) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113: 4069-4074

  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524048113
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    5F66, 5F6M

  • PubMed Abstract: 
  • X-ray diffraction has the potential to provide rich information about the structural dynamics of macromolecules. To realize this potential, both Bragg scattering, which is currently used to derive macromolecular structures, and diffuse scattering, which reports on correlations in charge density variations, must be measured ...

    X-ray diffraction has the potential to provide rich information about the structural dynamics of macromolecules. To realize this potential, both Bragg scattering, which is currently used to derive macromolecular structures, and diffuse scattering, which reports on correlations in charge density variations, must be measured. Until now, measurement of diffuse scattering from protein crystals has been scarce because of the extra effort of collecting diffuse data. Here, we present 3D measurements of diffuse intensity collected from crystals of the enzymes cyclophilin A and trypsin. The measurements were obtained from the same X-ray diffraction images as the Bragg data, using best practices for standard data collection. To model the underlying dynamics in a practical way that could be used during structure refinement, we tested translation-libration-screw (TLS), liquid-like motions (LLM), and coarse-grained normal-modes (NM) models of protein motions. The LLM model provides a global picture of motions and was refined against the diffuse data, whereas the TLS and NM models provide more detailed and distinct descriptions of atom displacements, and only used information from the Bragg data. Whereas different TLS groupings yielded similar Bragg intensities, they yielded different diffuse intensities, none of which agreed well with the data. In contrast, both the LLM and NM models agreed substantially with the diffuse data. These results demonstrate a realistic path to increase the number of diffuse datasets available to the wider biosciences community and indicate that dynamics-inspired NM structural models can simultaneously agree with both Bragg and diffuse scattering.


    Organizational Affiliation

    Computer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 jfraser@fraserlab.com mewall@lanl.gov.



Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Cationic trypsin A223Bos taurusMutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.4.21.4
Find proteins for P00760 (Bos taurus)
Explore P00760 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00760
Protein Feature View
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 3 Unique
IDChainsName / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
BEN
Query on BEN

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
A
BENZAMIDINE
C7 H8 N2
PXXJHWLDUBFPOL-UHFFFAOYSA-N
 Ligand Interaction
SO4
Query on SO4

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
A
SULFATE ION
O4 S
QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L
 Ligand Interaction
CA
Query on CA

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
A
CALCIUM ION
Ca
BHPQYMZQTOCNFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
 Ligand Interaction
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.10 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.154 
  • R-Value Work: 0.145 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.145 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 21
  • Diffraction Data DOI: 10.15785/SBGRID/201 SBGrid
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 54.81α = 90
b = 58.51β = 90
c = 67.42γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
XDSdata reduction
XSCALEdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2016-01-06
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2016-03-30
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2016-04-13
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2016-06-22
    Changes: Database references