4QGH

S.aureus TMK in complex with potent inhibitor compound 47

X-RAY DIFFRACTION

---

Crystallization

Crystalization Experiments
ID	Method	pH	Temperature	Details
1	VAPOR DIFFUSION, SITTING DROP		293	To obtain the inhibitor bound crystal form of TMK-S.aureus crystals were initially grown in the absence of compound using the sitting drop method at 293 K with a reservoir solution of 100 mM PCPT (propionate-cacodylate-bistris propane buffer) pH 7-8, 21-24% PEG 3350, 200 mM Mg2Cl using 1:1 protein:reservoir solution with the protein solution at 13 mg/mL. Crystals were harvested and soaked overnight in a solution containing 100 mM PCPT, 35% PEG 3350, 200 mM Mg2Cl and 1-2 mM or compound from a 100 mM DMSO stock. After soaking the crystals were cryoprotected by soaking for 15 minutes in compound-soak solution supplemented with 20% ethylene glycol, VAPOR DIFFUSION, SITTING DROP

Crystal Properties
Matthews coefficient	Solvent content
2.18	43.65

Crystal Data

Unit Cell
Length ( Å )	Angle ( ˚ )
a = 45.639	α = 90
b = 90.14	β = 99.37
c = 50.455	γ = 90

Symmetry
Space Group	P 1 21 1

Diffraction

Diffraction Experiment
ID #	Crystal ID	Scattering Type	Data Collection Temperature	Detector	Detector Type	Details	Collection Date	Monochromator	Protocol
1	1	x-ray	140	CCD	RAYONIX MX-225	monochrom. diamond (111)	2011-03-30		SINGLE WAVELENGTH

Radiation Source
ID #	Source	Type	Wavelength List	Synchrotron Site	Beamline
1	SYNCHROTRON	APS BEAMLINE 31-ID	0.978	APS	31-ID

Data Collection

Overall
ID #	Resolution (High)	Resolution (Low)	Percent Possible (Observed)	R Sym I (Observed)	Net I Over Average Sigma (I)	Redundancy	Number Reflections (All)	Number Reflections (Observed)	Observed Criterion Sigma (F)	Observed Criterion Sigma (I)	B (Isotropic) From Wilson Plot
1	1.781	29.297	98.5	0.036	20.3	3.5	37864	37864			20.8

Highest Resolution Shell
ID #	Resolution (High)	Resolution (Low)	Percent Possible (All)	Percent Possible (Observed)	R Merge I (Observed)	R-Sym I (Observed)	Mean I Over Sigma (Observed)	Redundancy	Number Unique Reflections (All)
1	1.78	1.88	96.7		0.168	0.168	4.6	3.4

Refinement

Statistics
Diffraction ID	Structure Solution Method	Cross Validation method	Resolution (High)	Resolution (Low)	Number Reflections (All)	Number Reflections (Observed)	Number Reflections (R-Free)	Percent Reflections (Observed)	R-Factor (Observed)	R-Work	R-Free	R-Free Selection Details	Mean Isotropic B
X-RAY DIFFRACTION	MOLECULAR REPLACEMENT	THROUGHOUT	1.78	28.36	38570	37830	1891	98.08	0.1779	0.1763	0.2074	RANDOM	24.03

Temperature Factor Modeling
Anisotropic B[1][1]	Anisotropic B[1][2]	Anisotropic B[1][3]	Anisotropic B[2][2]	Anisotropic B[2][3]	Anisotropic B[3][3]
-2.9782		-5.4041	5.7482		-2.77

RMS Deviations
Key	Refinement Restraint Deviation
t_other_torsion	16.19
t_omega_torsion	3.3
t_angle_deg	1.03
t_bond_d	0.01
t_dihedral_angle_d
t_incorr_chiral_ct
t_pseud_angle
t_trig_c_planes
t_gen_planes
t_it
t_nbd
t_improper_torsion
t_chiral_improper_torsion
t_sum_occupancies
t_utility_distance
t_utility_angle
t_utility_torsion
t_ideal_dist_contact

Non-Hydrogen Atoms Used in Refinement
Non-Hydrogen Atoms	Number
Protein Atoms	3096
Nucleic Acid Atoms
Solvent Atoms	267
Heterogen Atoms	76

Software

Software
Software Name	Purpose
SCALA	data scaling
BUSTER-TNT	refinement
PDB_EXTRACT	data extraction
JDirector	data collection
PROCESS	data reduction
AMoRE	phasing
BUSTER	refinement