SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-1H NOESY0.2-2.0 mM DNA, 0.2-2.0 mM PQ390% H2O/10% D2O457298
22D 1H-1H NOESY0.2-2.0 mM DNA, 0.2-2.0 mM PQ3100% D2O457298
32D 1H-1H TOCSY0.2-2.0 mM DNA, 0.2-2.0 mM PQ3100% D2O457298
42D 1H-13C HSQC1.0 mM DNA, 1.0 mM [U-100% 13C]-CH3 PQ3100% D2O907298
52D 13C-filtered HSQC-NOESY1.0 mM DNA, 1.0 mM [U-100% 13C]-CH3 PQ3100% D2O907298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAMX600
2BrukerAMX700
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
DGSA-distance geometry simulated annealing, simulated annealing, molecular dynamicsExtracted distances from structure of free DNA (PDB entry 2A5P) were used during calculationAmber
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number10
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1geometry optimizationAmberCase, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
2refinementAmberCase, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
3structure solutionAmberCase, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
4chemical shift assignmentSparkyGoddard
5data analysisSparkyGoddard
6peak pickingSparkyGoddard
7collectionTopSpinBruker Biospin
8processingTopSpinBruker Biospin
9geometry optimizationX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
10refinementX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
11structure solutionX-PLOR NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore