2M9X

Solution NMR Structure of Microtubule-associated serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 from Homo sapiens, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) Target HR9151A

SOLUTION NMR

---

NMR Experiment
Experiment	Type	Sample Contents	Solvent	Ionic Strength	pH	Pressure	Temperature (K)	Spectrometer
1	2D 1H-15N HSQC	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
2	2D 1H-13C CT HSQC aliphatic	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
3	3D HNCO	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
4	3D CBCA(CO)NH	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
5	3D HNCACB	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
6	2D 1H-13C CT HSQC aromatic	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
7	3D simutaneous 13C-aromatic,13C-aliphatic,15N edited 1H-1H NOESY	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
8	3D HCCH-TOCSY	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
9	3D HBHA(CO)NH	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
10	3D HN(CA)CO	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
11	2D 1H-15N HSQC_wide	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
12	3D (H)CCH-COSYali	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
13	3D (H)CCH-COSYaro	0.508 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283
14	2D 1H-13C HSQC methyl	0.39 mM [%5-13C; U-100% 15N] HR9151A.011, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 uM DSS	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.5	ambient	283

NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer	Manufacturer	Model	Field Strength
1	Varian	INOVA	750

NMR Refinement
Method	Details	Software
simulated annealing	Structure was calculated by running CYANA and ASDP in parallel using NOE-based constraints and phi and psi dihedral angle constraints derived from Talos+. Consensus peak assignments were selected and used in iterative refinement with CYANA. The 20 conformers out of 100 with the lowest target function were further refined by simulated annealing in explicit water bath using the program CNS with PARAM19 force field.	CNS

NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria	structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number	100
Conformers Submitted Total Number	20
Representative Model	1 (lowest energy)

Computation: NMR Software
#	Classification	Version	Software Name	Author
1	refinement	CNS	1.3	Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2	structure solution	CNS	1.3	Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
3	geometry optimization	CNS	1.3	Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4	refinement	CYANA	3.0	Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5	geometry optimization	CYANA	3.0	Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
6	structure solution	CYANA	3.0	Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
7	data analysis	AutoStructure	2.1	Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
8	refinement	AutoStructure	2.1	Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
9	data analysis	AutoAssign	2.3.1	Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
10	chemical shift assignment	AutoAssign	2.3.1	Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
11	data analysis	XEASY		Bartels et al.
12	peak picking	XEASY		Bartels et al.
13	chemical shift assignment	XEASY		Bartels et al.
14	collection	VnmrJ	2.2D	Varian
15	geometry optimization	TALOS+		Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
16	structure validation	PSVS	1.4	Bhattacharya, Montelione
17	data analysis	CARA	1.8.4	Keller and Wuthrich
18	peak picking	CARA	1.8.4	Keller and Wuthrich
19	chemical shift assignment	CARA	1.8.4	Keller and Wuthrich
20	processing	PROSA		Guntert
21	data analysis	CSI		Wishart and Sykes